16 replies
  1. killer instinct
    killer instinct says:

    Ha! I feel so smug now about voting “the husband did it!”. As much as the son does not seem like a sane person, the husband seems sooo much more like the guy who did it. 39:21, the reading of the verdict, husband does not look like somebody mad because the killer of his wife is set free!!! He should have been furious, but he seems more mad at himself than anything. Do we have any lip readers onboard to transcribe what he was ?saying? at that moment?

  2. Russ Conte
    Russ Conte says:

    Reading this helped me clarify the way I do interviewing – I look for hot spots first. A hot spot is NOT a sign a person is guilty, but it is a sign there is probably more to the story. That means I need to listen more, dig more, check other sources, etc.

    Second I look for patterns. The first rule I tell new recruiters is this: If someone has done something once, chances are very good they’ll do it again, especially in similar circumstances. Not guaranteed, but incredibly likely. In short, people are their consistent patterns of behavior (as difficult as that can be to sort out sometimes).

    If I apply the first two rules (look for hot spots, look for patterns) to this case… well… the result is now obvious. Thanks to Eyes for posting this and helping us see the truth in this situation.

    • Karon
      Karon says:

      Hi Russ
      Did you notice that the husband didn’t think the son should get life in prison, because his wife wouldn’t have wanted that? I think he was thinking about, if he winds up convicted of this crime. He wanted to minimize the severity of the crime.

  3. remi
    remi says:

    Thank you for posting this story and sharing your skills. It’s always fascinating for me to read your thoughts & those of all the commenters. Sadly, two women lost their lives, and many other lives were altered forever in this one.

  4. Lisa B
    Lisa B says:

    Kevin seemed socially odd prior to the surgery. I think your thoughts on Aspergers are justified, especially given the step-sibling saying “he was all about himself and his way all the time.” It’s hard to say given the information, but something is not normal there. I also notice the step-father acting out the role he attributes to his step-son when talking about what happened. Wouldn’t a victim normally act out their own part rather than the aggressor’s when recalling what happened?

  5. Brent
    Brent says:

    A master manipulator. That fits. I admit my ears picked up when I heard about his previous wife tripping and falling into the pool and being found the next day. What I don’t understand is with those four windfalls why he isn’t looked into? He basically set up his step-son to take the blame for the murder! The idea of her son strangling her didn’t make sense to me. The stepfather must be a real chilling person.

  6. Seeking truth
    Seeking truth says:

    Has anyone looked at the news articles on William’s first wife one said she had a garden implement around her neck? Has anyone googled William’s recent arrest record?
    I think many of you would feel more certain about this man’s character.
    Pinellas county turns their heads.

Comments are closed.