Phylicia Rashad Speaks Out

Phylicia Rashad speaks out with a fake smile and a notably mad undertone in her voice. You can see her squint her eyes and purse her lips as she talks. All hint that she is steaming mad inside masking it by a soft voice and her social smile.

Rashad says, “What has happened is declaration in the media of guilt….without proof.”

When Reshad says this, she looses all credibility to me because she is basically saying a victim cannot speak out and share a story. She is not supporting free speech in any way. She is condemning almost 30 women for doing so! And if you notice she doesn’t even mention them. She just calls them “media”.  It’s rather appalling.  I wish she could have come out with a better argument, personally.

When challenged if she said earlier in the week, “Forget the women”, Reshad basically supports the quote was likely true! She doesn’t change her approach at all. She just re-words it by saying the same thing.

She says, “This is not about the women,” which is essentially dismissing them again–like forgetting them.

She goes on to say, “This is about an obliteration of a legacy.”

Yes, it’s all about poor Cosby, Mr. Reshad, not the women.

Why didn’t you just own what you originally said?

When Reshad says about the drugs and rape, “I can’t speak to those things and don’t want to” she squints her eyes again, which is a very negative response. I call it being “critical”.  It’s a form of disapproval.

It’s very clear that Reshad’s own legacy is being affected by Cosby. She was his side kick and if he goes down, she will be affected as well. She still got attention because of the Cosby show even after decades, but that will all disappear if Cosby is outcast. And whether she wants to admit it or not, it will affect her bottom line to one degree or another without question, if it hasn’t already.

What Reshad fails to see clearly is that Cosby was not going to do anything to anyone sexually or risky who had power and control. He was too smart to do that. That would have been his downfall and so hence, Reshad was safe.  Reshad was someone, who if she discovered his secret or was a target, could expose him in a big way–so he kept her in the dark with purpose and intention.  He also needed to keep his allies and clearly she is one worth protecting.  She is fiercely loyal no matter what.

What I think we see here is someone very upset for herself, and unable to look at the victims for who they really are. Very sad, if you ask me.

Wishing you a Happy, Happy New Year

Here is wishing you, my readers, a very happy, happy New Year! May 2015 be an incredible year full of happiness, success and lots of love!!

Thank you for sharing your lives with me! I look forward to another year together!

Cheers!
Renee

Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas!

I hope the holidays and the coming New Year bring you many, many smiles, laughter and love!

Renee

Devil of Death

We’ve heard the story before–a so-called “Angel of Death” cuts people’s lives short by sinister killings in a medical setting because they have access and ability. It’s happened again this time in Italy. Daniela Poggiali is thought to have killed 98 patients in the course of a year (source), and as many as three in one day!

While the story is mortifying, Daniela took it a step further and took selfies with the victims smiling.  Yes, smiling!

It’s absolutely chilling.

Don’t search for the pictures unless you want to feel really creeped out!  I warn you. I’ve seen them and they are flat out awful.  Thankfully, they do blur the victim in the one photo released.

Charles Cullen was a U.S. nurse that is suspected of killing upwards of 400 people over a 16 year period. Sadly, hospitals became suspicious of him, but simply let him go, and he was left to continue to murdering more people at different hospitals each time he was let go. And he was let go multiple times after suspicious behavior.

Cullen told 60 Minutes that he killed people because he felt sorry for his patients, but that was one big fat lie with hot spots to prove it.

I think these people should be called the devils of death, personally.

Serial Podcast

Many of you have told me about the Serial podcast and how riveting it is, and that you’d like my opinion. I typically don’t look at older cases unless I can hear the suspect speak prior to or during trial. The reason is once someone has been convicted of a crime, the pressure on them diminishes and the clues to deception will also diminish or completely cease.

I have had a busy month and I haven’t had time to even open the podcast so I have a few questions.

Does the podcast have interviews from prior to or during the trial of the key people? That is most essential for me.

If there are, please point me to the podcasts that contain these interviews (with time markers please) and I will see if I can fit it into my schedule.

I am not one who likes to listen to others tell the story because their bias and opinions can skew the truth. I rely 100% on the actual people who are being looked at to the get the truth. They are most reliable source we have.