Did you catch Final Witness last night? They told the story of Donnah and Mark Winger (pictured above). For those of you who saw it, 48 Hours told this story back in 2008 and titled it “Invitation to Murder”.
Arrogance, once again, was the undoing of an evil person. Gotta love that trait–its so telling. Who do you know in your life who is arrogant? Do you keep an extra eye on them?
When the jury for the Drew Peterson trial was being selected, guess who participated in their selection? None other than Drew Peterson himself.
Drew Peterson’s attorney, Joel Brodsky even said to the media, “We have the ultimate jury consultant and that’s ah…Drew Peterson.”
Yes, you can say that’s no surprise because Drew Peterson is arrogant, but on this one, I have to agree he is likely very good at reading people, understanding people’s vulnerabilities and weaknesses as well as their strengths!
Smart psychopaths can read people extremely well!
Here is a fascinating article about introverts and extroverts.
Psychology TodayField Guide to the Loner: The Real Insiders
Most people assume introverts are shy reclusive people. While a percentage of them are–not all introverts are shy or withdrawn.
Are you an introvert or an extrovert?
What do you think I am?
Take an introvert/extrovert quiz!
Many people wonder what I think when I watch James Holmes in his court appearance today. To be honest, I have to wonder if he has been given some medicating drugs, because while he is conscious, he doesn’t seem to be lucid at times. His facial reactions seem to be appear more from what is going on in his mind than what is going on in the courtroom.
His eyes aren’t focusing on people, and its
When I listen to Zimmerman speak, I see a man who has not only been coached to speak, but I also see a man who is incredibly inconsistent and self-centered. This is all about Zimmerman. It’s a public media campaign to win the public over, but as a body language and deception expert, he’s failed miserably.
He is not confident in what he is saying, doesn’t own the words that come out of his mouth and shows us this by the vast amount of clues that he leaves behind in his wake. These are not his natural thoughts, if you want my opinion–not even close. I quiver to hear what Zimmerman really thinks.
I can pick out the words, the sentences, the points he was told to make. They jump at me like lightening on a dark night.
Zimmerman is also very inconsistent and can’t even get one minute into the interview–on his first question–when he says he hasn’t had time to reflect and then he immediately says that’s had lots of time to reflect. He is all over the place because he’s not being genuine to himself or us. If he is honest, he’d have no reason to jump all over, but he clearly is jumping all over. He’s like split mercury on the floor– try to pin it down and you can’t!
Zimmerman’s speech is also choppy because he is thinking constantly as he speaks. Why does he feel the need to be so controlled? Honest people’s words flow when they speak because honest thoughts come to us as second nature.
Why doesn’t he have any emotions about taking someone’s life?
If I killed someone in self-defense, even if it was justified, I would still be sad that I was put in that position–that I had no option but to take a life. That would disturb me and most people. I might even be mad, but not Zimmerman. He’s arrogant and self-righteous, yet gives us no credible reason to sympathize with his behavior that night. He gives us nothing to feel he was truly in a position where he had to take a life. His story is so inconsistent, its without question unbelievable.
We also aren’t seeing normal emotions in Zimmerman because I believe he feels he has to suppress himself, or he will never stand a chance.
I also don’t believe Zimmerman that he’s never heard of the stand your ground law. Did you see that sheepish smile?
I don’t have a clue where Hannity is getting the idea that Martin reached for something when he first alledgedly circled Zimmerman in his car. This is news to me. However, about this incident Zimmerman says to Hannity, “I was certain I could see him saying something to me.” Really? In Zimmerman’s written statement to police, which was taken right after the incident, he actually hand wrote these words, “I could not hear if he said anything.”
This is the third analysis I have done of Zimmerman and in each one, it is littered with changing stories, and inconsistencies.
Now read this shenanigans: It speaks for itself.
HANNITY: …then we get to the issue where you said to — on the 911 call that he’s running. You said that to the dispatch. Is there any chance in retrospect as you look back on that night and what happened, and the nation obviously is paying a lot of attention to this–
ZIMMERMAN: Yes, sir.
HANNITY: — trying to maybe get into the mind-set, because we also have learned that Trayvon was speaking with his girlfriend supposedly at the time — that maybe he was afraid of you, didn’t know who you were?
ZIMMERMAN: No.
HANNITY: You don’t think — why do you think that he was running then?
ZIMMERMAN: Maybe I said running, but he was more —
HANNITY: You said he’s running.
ZIMMERMAN: Yes. He was like skipping, going away quickly. But he wasn’t running out of fear.
HANNITY: You could tell the difference?
ZIMMERMAN: He wasn’t running.
HANNITY: So he wasn’t actually running?
ZIMMERMAN: No, sir.
HANNITY: OK. Because that’s what you said to the dispatcher, that you thought he was running.
When someone will change a story like this to support their beliefs, its clear we aren’t going to get anything reliable from Zimmerman outside of more manipulation and control and deceit.
I’m hoping to get more time to watch the rest of this! I haven’t made it to “Gods Plan” yet. I think I could write a novel on Zimmerman’s inconsistencies!
