Genuine Emotions, or Not?

A reader asked me yesterday to comment on Hillary Clinton’s emotions in this video yesterday. Do I believe they are genuine, or are they faked?

I believe that Hillary Clinton is being absolutely genuine here. Look at her eyes. They get glassy (wet). She opens them wide to see better because of the moisture. Her voice cracks. Her pitch changes, and the facial expressions she makes supports someone who is feeling emotional.

Got a question about a candidates body language or facial expression? Ask me.

Note to Readers:
(1)
I do not endorse any candidate. I am merely trying to help people understand the candidates as best as I can. (2) I do not wish to get involved in the political debate. I merely wish to answer genuine and honest questions about body language, and facial expressions.(3) As long as I believe I can remain unbiased, I will continue to do so. (4) I do not moderate my comments, and I don’t plan to, but if people decided to make my blog a political place to vent, I will start moderating until the election are finished, or I will stop talking about politicians in general. (5) Respectful opinions are welcome, however, political bashing will not be tolerated.

Presidential Candidates

How many people would like to see me discuss facial expressions and authenticity of presidential candidates?

I was asked by a few readers today what I thought about reactions, facial expressions, and body language of one candidate today, and if I can answer people’s questions without getting involved in the politics, I will do so. I won’t speak about politicians in general.

I am willing to consider it, if there is interest, but I make no promises that I will answer all questions simply because if I see a sticky situation, I may very well avoid it to prevent a political mess!

So, what are your thoughts?

Clarification: I only plan to answer questions on body language and facial expressions.

Open Forum

I see Greta Van Susteren occasionally opens up a post on her blog, and leaves it up to the readers to comment. Would you enjoy that here?

Speak away! Tell me what is on your mind! I’m listening.

With that, I have a question, why are people so shy about commenting here? I don’t bite, really! I see I get many visitors, but few commenters. What can I do to change that?

You don’t have to log in, type your real name, or provide an e-mail address in the comments, so what is holding you back? Too shy to tell me here, you can write to me in private, if you feel more comfortable.

Oh, and I have a new post rating system. See the stars below at the bottom of this post? Click on them. Please tell me what you like, and what you don’t like by a quick vote after reading a post. You are not tracked in anyway. So, how about giving it a whirl?

Roger Clemens: My Thoughts

Many of you have asked me over the past several days, in private, if I believe Roger Clemens.

The first time I had ever heard Roger Clemens name was last week: I kid you not. I am not a pro-sport enthusiast for many reasons, but that is an entirely different topic. While I had heard of the Mitchell report, I didn’t pay much attention to it. Steroids in sports are no surprise.

Anyway, one reader asked me to watch a clip about Roger Clemens online at CBS last week, and then I saw the full Roger Clemens interview this past Sunday on CBS 60 Minutes.

When I watched the interview, while I didn’t see any indications of deception, I didn’t get a positive feeling that, boy, this guy is honest. What I got out of the 60 Minutes interview with Clemens was simply that he was angry, upset, frustrated and stressed out, but there was nothing more conclusive in the interview.

Clearly, Clemens could be frustrated, angry and annoyed that the truth came out equally as much as he could be that someone is lying about him using steroids.

Read moreWorse, since Clemens is exceptionally wealthy, one of the richest athletes in North America, he may feel a superiority and power with his financial status, and believe that he can overcome anything. I do detect an arrogance.

This, I fear, could impact his demeanor, beliefs and feelings about what he can and cannot do–what he can get away with. It could diminish his “fear” if he was lying as he has the power and connections to make things happen, and that, in turn, could effect the clues that leak and indicate deception. Read more about high-stake lies here.

Clemens high-stakes scenario is not as high-stakes when you factor in the power of money, influence and status. If Clemens or the Clemens camp can pressure McNamee, or offer him something under the table (or others for the matter), it can have major impact to these allegations. He knows it, you know it, and I know it. Money buys many things. And if McNamee is as desperate as he sounds, will we ever know the truth? If Clemens camp discredits McNamee, and McNamee falsely fesses that he made it all up (hypothetically), who will believe whom?

That gives me pause in watching for clues to deception in this scenario, and makes me question the efficacy of it all with the uber-rich. Maybe that is why I have been hesitant to give opinions on big pro athletes.

It’s certainly not black and white. There will be cases where power and influence are weaker, and the effects won’t be the same, but it is something to consider when power, influence, status, and money are equally strong. If the baseball industry as a whole were steadfast against steroids, that would change things but we are not dealing with an industry that is. None of the players are willing to denounce others if they use steroids.

There is a known problem with steroids within the industry, and yet we still allow the industry to self-police, if I understand it correctly, which makes absolutely no sense. This is a business where billions of dollars are generated, and one that keeps a large group of people “uber” wealthy. There are plenty of people here who would have reason to fight and support Clemens, regardless of what the truth is.

To expect one to cut off his own foot in the name of morality isn’t likely to happen anytime soon. What industry is going to cut off a billion dollar money generator, and admit to their advantage? Be reasonable.

Furthermore, these powerhouses have the funds, and connections to do what they have done before, to create undetectable drugs. It’s big business. Why on earth would they stop when the public keeps swarming to them despite all the allegations?

With that, while I have a suspicion in this circumstance, power, money, influence and status all can impact the clues I see, rendering them less effective and less trusthworthy. Furthermore, Clemens has an industry that has every reason to want to fight for Clemens, regardless of the truth, which further complicates this situation.

I hope you appreciate my sincere honesty to refrain from an opinion on Roger Clemens.

Hannah Montana Mom really sorry?

I am sure most of you have heard about the mom who helped her daughter write an essay in hopes of winning free tickets to the Hannah Montana concert in New York on January 9th. She wrote an essay, and won.

Priscilla Ceballos helped her six year old daughter write “My daddy died this year in Iraq. I am going to give mommy the Angel pendant that daddy put on mommy when she was having me. I had it in my jewelry box since that day. I love my mommy.”

It was a complete lie. Her dad didn’t die in Iraq. Furthermore, these are clearly not the thoughts of six year old. It doesn’t take an Einstein to see that.

Ceballos tells everyone that she didn’t know it was breaking the rule to create a fictitious story.

Oh really?

Read moreCeballos seems to forget the moral obligation of parents to teach children honesty, and how to win a competition with integrity and fairness. Instead, she tries to twist the truth again. She wants you to continue to buy her deceptive games. She wants you to believe she just didn’t know any better.

Excuse me, but I’m not buying it. And Ceballos boldly takes it a step further. Watch here.

Matt Lauer says, “How did you explain to your daughter that she won, and then lost this contests?”

Ceballos responds, “…I..I…I really haven’t. I mean… I really told her…I’ve actually told her the truth. You know, I told her we wrote an essay and… you know, their…they…they said it was a lie and you know… we… I…I refused to accept the tickets.”

Matt Lauer says, “Refused to accept the tickets or they were taken away from you?”

Ceballos says, “Well…I…I did refused to accept them, but I told her that, you know…there… there will be another time.”

Refused to accept them? Told her child the truth?

Ceballos is continuing to add insult to injury. She is insulting us with her “stories” a second time around.