Oprah Winfrey aired an interview with Matthew Sandusky, the son of Jerry Sandusky, last week. Unfortunately, I was unable to watch it, but I did catch about 15 minutes of the interview with Oprah online.
When I watch Matthew talk in the video above, I see no indication that he is being deceptive. I will say this is not a high stake scenario–where he faces a loss or a gain–by telling his story, so we must remember this. The stakes of the situation are past now for him, which reduces the pressure on him.
Dottie Sandusky has spoken out about Matt in very negative ways. I never believed Jerry Sandusky nor do I believe Dottie Sandusky either.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2014-07-22 15:02:012014-08-12 15:15:47Matthew Sandusky Talks to Oprah
This is an interesting video to watch. The husband, Sam, talks to a reporter about the recent death of his wife, who was found dead along a road. He shows absolutely no sadness whatsoever when talking about her. This pings me.
Furthermore, he says their relationship was all about love, yet in another report neighbors talked about how the police were called to the residence at least six times since 2012, so by that we can see Sam is not being forthright. It wasn’t all about love–there were problems.
I am also disturbed by the fact he recorded her that night and saved it, and plays that for the reporter. In the interview above, he says his wife was determined to go to the bar. In another audio recording on the web, he says she was just going for a walk.
This story at this point concerns me… I have some questions for Sam.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2014-07-18 12:54:532014-08-12 15:15:48Jennifer Martello Found Dead
If you watched Dateline this past weekend, you saw the horrific story of what happened to Linda LeBrane. She endured a brutal attack by three people who nearly killed her. She was lucky to live.
I won’t detail the Dateline episode as it takes many twists and turns, but I do want to say that I believe Sarah Pearce is innocent and not the person who harmed Linda LeBrane. I am happy she has been released from prison, but I am sad she still has the conviction hanging over her head.
Most people don’t realize that eye witness accounts are not as reliable as we think. The Innocence Project has been working to share information on this and make changes to the system, and I agree they need to be made.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2014-07-16 16:41:542014-08-12 15:15:48Sarah Pearce Story on Dateline
If you watched ABC 20/20 this weekend, you got to see the story of a nanny, a homeless woman, who took a job for free room and board in exchange for cooking and cleaning for a family with two boys. The agreement posted on Craiglist was clearly vague.
So who is telling the truth here?
I personally don’t believe either party and I believe both wanted something for free, and they each got more than they bargained for.
On 20/20, the reporter says the nanny claimed the original agreement was 20 hours a week. The homeowner, Marcella says back, “Ummmm….no.” To which the reporter shoots back, so what was it? Marcella says, “I would say…she probably a week ten hours.”
First off, Marcella doesn’t answer the question and jumbles her answer all up. And second, who would bring a woman into your home for 10 hours a week of work, feeds her and let her share your home? No one — that’s who. It would be much cheaper to hire someone to come in on an hourly basis and it wouldn’t invade your privacy. This is nonsense.
Ralph Bracamonte said, “It was help out with the kids when needed, to pick up little things and to maybe prep up a little bit of dinner if [Marcella] was running a little bit late.” Do you see how he minimized everything? Ralph also said the nanny was like “family” yet within two weeks things started to sour? This is inconsistent.
And on behalf of the nanny, she said this job would allow her to ” …get my legs up and take care of my heart condition.” This is flat out inconsistent. I suspect she knew the laws and thought she’d find a free home for a while and she did. She was identified on 20/20 as being “… listed on the state of California’s Vexatious Litigant List.” What does that mean? She is known to sue people without just cause. How does that translate? People use the threat of lawsuits frequently to get people to cave in or buckle to their demands.
I think they both say all we need to know to see the truth. What do you think?
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2014-07-14 13:42:552014-08-12 15:15:48The Nanny Who Won’t Move Out: Who’s Lying?
There is an interesting study about how the color red influences our beliefs on the person wearing it! Check this out…
Women don’t trust other women who wear red around their spouse or significant other!
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2014-07-11 15:05:442014-08-12 15:15:49Women in red: What does it say?
