Renee Ellory |  Eyes for Lies
  • Home
  • About
    • Articles
    • Media Appearances
    • Myths to Deception Detection
  • Services
    • Deception Detection & Credibility Training
    • Facial Profiling
      • The Science of Facial Profiling
    • Who has Renee trained?
  • Testimonials
    • Video Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Instagram

Thinking in Pictures

November 8, 2016/4 Comments/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

Temple Grandin is absolutely fascinating to listen to! I just love her. She talks about what makes her different in the video above–if you have time–it’s a fascinating speech!

She talks about how people with autism process communication.

When you listen to someone tell you a story, how to think about it? Do you think in language or perhaps pictures? Or maybe a combination of both?

I have known for a while I think in pictures for most of my thoughts, but I thought everyone did. I don’t even know if I can even think verbally. I never see words. I always see images. I paint movies in my head like Temple Grandin talks about.

I have realized some of my ability to pick out liars comes from being a visual person. I paint the stories people tell as images in my head and make mental movies of them, so when people change their stories, I see the movies and know the story has changed. I don’t think at all in terms of words, though words can stand out to me. This concept is rather perplexing to me.

I, like Temple Grandin, thought most people thought in pictures.

How do you think?

[polldaddy poll=9574671]

Tags: Temple Grandin
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2016-11-08 13:58:572016-11-08 13:58:57Thinking in Pictures
4 replies
  1. Doux
    Doux says:
    November 8, 2016 at 3:19 pm

    I can’t participate in the poll. 🙁 I don’t fit into those categories. Sound and inflection make a difference to me, and images, shapes, colors, and the feelings they evoke make a difference to me, but I can only figure that I am a conceptual thinker? I had not considered this until asked and I don’t think that I am unlike Temple, but I don’t think that I am the same, either. That’s a bizarre statement, but I know someone will understand that! I will notice differences in patterns of anything. Sound, expressions, temperament, departures from vocabulary, body language, pitch, color, scent, temperature, general timing, etc. …but it’s not really about “patterns.” Crap, I have to think about this, I am just not hitting the nail on the head. lol, it’s not every day that you try to be objective about your own process. What I think is easier for me to tell you than how I think. However, I can tell you how someone else thinks in far easier. That’s messed up. lol

  2. Brent
    Brent says:
    November 8, 2016 at 5:33 pm

    I think without a doubt words are useful for thinking with. Without concepts there isn’t much thought, nor much communication of thought to others. But there is a place for visual thinking. I’m actually looking at visualization in mathematics and find it very useful.

  3. Chris
    Chris says:
    November 14, 2016 at 4:35 pm

    I’m a very verbal thinking but for the record, I don’t see the words. I hear them. It’s basically a long string of talking to mysel about a subject. And what Temple said about the church steeple was dead-on to me. It the topic of thought is primarily a visual one, I get a vague composite image of the object, not a specific one. And I am quite terrible with details and visualization. I am quite good with logic and abstract thought. But my real point is I don’t think most language based thinkers see the words. I would be curious if others had a different experience

  4. Paul Flanagan
    Paul Flanagan says:
    November 15, 2016 at 12:21 am

    I’ve always considered myself a visual person. I’ve also had people describe me as someone who they believes is a visual person. And yet, like you I think, I don’t know for sure that I don’t think in words either. I never thought about thinking in words. I’m not sure what that’s like… so I may do it do, or I may be able to do it. I remember going on a hike when I was about 10 years old. It was about 2 hours each way, through thick woods, over rocks, through creeks. For the next few years, I was positive I could retrace every single step and marker (there was no path) and hike it on my own.
    In NYC, somebody only needs to say a street and it’s cross street, and if I’ve been there (which by now, I probably have, although the city changes fast), I can visualize what’s there or pretty darn close. I’ll start big and go small: 34th & 7th. That’s Penn Station. I know that, but I’m looking for 30th and 8th, so I’ll re walk myself in my minds eye through that terrain (as much as I can). Doesn’t always work, but often enough to surprise me.
    I don’t know though when somebody says, “house”. I think of a white basic house. I could add more detail if I wanted to, but it depends on context. I’m not sure if I’m the same as this woman in regard to thinking in pictures.
    I do know when somebody says something jokingly vulgar or disgusting, I often find myself saying, “Stop. I’m really visual and that image took 1 second to create and it’ll be day for me to forget.”
    Anyway, when I get time I’m going to watch her entire talk. I think it’s an hour twenty. Thanks!

Comments are closed.

NEW ONLINE TRAINING COMING SOON!
Get Notified of Future Courses

Renee Ellory has written this blog since 2006, dedicating her free time to help others understand people. By sharing her insights on human behavior, deception and the truth.

Many people have shared with Renee their personal stories of how her insight has greatly affected their lives. It definitely motivates Renee to continue to dedicate her time when she is available.

Renee tracked her accuracy publicly for 7.5 years, and was 95% accurate, whereas the average person is 54% accurate. She didn’t miss a case for five years sharing her thoughts before the truth was known! She is a scientifically tested and studied expert.

While she doesn’t track her cases anymore due to limited time, she still shares her opinions with the public when time allows.

Search

Search Search

Archives

Suggest a Topic

Recent Posts

  • Stress is the Great Unmasker. Use It. December 9, 2025
  • Do Liars Really Touch Their Nose More? Here’s the Truth. December 4, 2025
  • ChatGPT Told Me a Liar Was Telling the Truth—Here’s What It Missed.  December 1, 2025
  • ChatGPT Called a Liar “Honest” – Renee Reacts on Substack November 30, 2025
  • Pressure Testing an LLM: Hallucinations, Tone Drift, and the Cost of Lying Nicely April 16, 2025
Please note because this is blog is over a decade old some information has been lost in the multiple transitions between platforms. When you see a missing post or a post without comments, it was likely lost during a migration. Our sincerest apologies.

Thank you for visitiing!

Eyes for Lies | Renee Ellory

Link to: The Story of Eyeglass Lies Link to: The Story of Eyeglass Lies The Story of Eyeglass Lies Link to: Dangerous People: How to Identify Them Link to: Dangerous People: How to Identify Them Dangerous People: How to Identify Them
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top