A Closer Look at Brad Cooper

Per your request, I have spent a short period of time watching Brad Cooper talk in the video deposition that has been released online. I also couldn’t help but glance at the affidavits in the case that were listed in the sidebar near the video links. With that, I thought I would share with you my first impressions and thoughts.

Read morePlease know I did not watch any deposition in its entirety. I reviewed at a couple of segments highlighted for me, by you, my readers. Thank you for giving me time markers, it is much appreciated.

  1. The first thing I noticed about Brad Cooper is that he is what I call a classic neutral person. Classic neutral people are void of emotional expression.

    [From an earlier post]

    These people are hardest to read, because these people don’t express a lot of emotion. Neutral people tend to lack genuine enthusiasm, and most often come across as someone who is not excitable. They usually come across as mundane and monotone.

    While the majority of people who fall into the neutral category are suspicious, it does not mean that they are lying. And that is where it gets tricky. Some people just lack normal expressive emotions and instead are subdued, even when they are telling the truth.

    With that, I am left to ask, is this normal behavior for Brad, or is this notable and unusual?

    Most people are not this baseline in their emotions especially after something as traumatic as loss of your wife to murder. Most people would be devastated/angry/mad for their children that they have been robbed of a mother, at the very least. Yet I see none of this with Brad. It definitely raises my eyebrows.

    Since Brad does seem to be a reserved type of person who could repress his emotions, and he was going through a divorce, I would need to know from his friends if this is the “typical Brad” or if his behavior is notably different. If his friends told me his emotions were notably void here, it would raise a big red flag.

  2. Since we can’t depend on Brad’s emotions and body language to guide us positively or negatively, the next thing we need to look at are his words, and the facts. Is Brad consistent in what he is saying?

    The first video I zoomed into was what Brad says happened the day that Nancy disappeared. Almost immediately, I found a big inconsistency in what Brad is saying when he talks about running to the store the morning Nancy disappeared. In the deposition here (around time marker 25:00), Brad talks about how his wife Nancy was upset that they were out of detergent.

    Questioner:
    When you got home from the Harris Teeter, what did you do?

    Cooper:
    When I got home from Harris Teeter, I put the milk back in the fridge. Um..by this time, the washing machine had finished the first load that, um, we had put in earlier, and um, Nancy then indicated that we were out of laundry detergent and was upset that we were out of laundry detergent as well.

    Questioner:
    Was she upset with you about that?

    Cooper:
    Yes, she… well, she was upset that one, we ran low on milk, we ran low on laundry detergent, and um, she was gone the week prior so she kind of felt it was my fault that I hadn’t restocked with milk and laundry detergent. (Time marker 25:18).

    Questioner:
    So what does she say?

    Cooper:
    She indicated that it was kind of my fault and therefore my responsibility and hop back in the car and go to the store and pick up laundry detergent.

  3. If you compare that to what Brad said in an affidavit here, Brad’s story has changed.

    “I start to get ready for the girls to get up and noticed we were out of laundry detergent and could not do laundry, so Nancy asked me to go back out to get some laundry detergent around 6:30 A.M.”

    I find this odd and perplexing. Why is Brad not able to keep his facts straight? In one version, his wife notices they are out of laundry soap. In the other, he notices. In the deposition, he starts the laundry and does one load. In the affidavit, he says he “could not do laundry”.

    This is a notable red flag. When we are honest, we remember the basic details of what we did and who discovered what. We don’t confuse basic facts such as this.

  4. It’s also very notable (above) that Brad talks about getting ready for the girls to “get up” in the affidavit. Yet oddly, in his deposition, he talks about how Katie, his daughter, was up early and fussing because she didn’t have milk, and that he went to get her milk, came home and got a bottle of milk to give to Katie. He wasn’t home a few minutes before the laundry detergent scenario played out, and after returning with the laundry detergent he tells us he takes Katie back upstairs with him to put her down.

    What is the truth here? Was Katie up or not? Clearly, Brad is having a hard time keeping his facts straight and that begs us to question why.

  5. It’s odd, too, that when Brad Cooper went to the grocery store the first time, he knew exactly how he got there. He was sure about his route. The second time, however, he couldn’t remember which way he went, yet he said he remembered getting a phone call at a specific intersection. Why did he take a different route? How come he remembers this specific phone call, but he doesn’t remember the different route? It’s perplexing. Notice that Brad is asked why he took a different route, but he doesn’t answer the question.
  6. Brad Cooper in this deposition tells us that he cleaned out the garage on June 28th so that one car could fit into their two car garage. He explains that it was summer and hot, and that Nancy needed a cool car for the kids.

    Yet ironically, Gary Beard, of Gary’s Pest Control, says in his affidavit that he entered the garage on July 8 and that there was no way a car could be parked inside the garage due to the toys and things Brad says he supposedly removed. It’s another inconsistency, another oddity, another red flag. Why would Gary Beard lie about this? Why would Brad Cooper lie about this?

At this point, from what little I have reviewed, I think it is clear that Brad is unable to keep his facts straight, and that concerns me.
_______________________________
Update:  Brad Cooper was sentenced to life in prison May 2011 for the killing of his wife, Nancy.

A Closer Look at Brad Cooper

Per your request, I have spent a short period of time watching Brad Cooper talk in the video deposition that has been released online. I also couldn’t help but glance at the affidavits in the case that were listed in the sidebar near the video links. With that, I thought I would share with you my first impressions and thoughts.

Read morePlease know I did not watch any deposition in its entirety. I reviewed at a couple of segments highlighted for me, by you, my readers. Thank you for giving me time markers, it is much appreciated.

  1. The first thing I noticed about Brad Cooper is that he is what I call a classic neutral person. Classic neutral people are void of emotional expression.

    [From an earlier post]

    These people are hardest to read, because these people don’t express a lot of emotion. Neutral people tend to lack genuine enthusiasm, and most often come across as someone who is not excitable. They usually come across as mundane and monotone.

    While the majority of people who fall into the neutral category are suspicious, it does not mean that they are lying. And that is where it gets tricky. Some people just lack normal expressive emotions and instead are subdued, even when they are telling the truth.

    With that, I am left to ask, is this normal behavior for Brad, or is this notable and unusual?

    Most people are not this baseline in their emotions especially after something as traumatic as loss of your wife to murder. Most people would be devastated/angry/mad for their children that they have been robbed of a mother, at the very least. Yet I see none of this with Brad. It definitely raises my eyebrows.

    Since Brad does seem to be a reserved type of person who could repress his emotions, and he was going through a divorce, I would need to know from his friends if this is the “typical Brad” or if his behavior is notably different. If his friends told me his emotions were notably void here, it would raise a big red flag.

  2. Since we can’t depend on Brad’s emotions and body language to guide us positively or negatively, the next thing we need to look at are his words, and the facts. Is Brad consistent in what he is saying?

    The first video I zoomed into was what Brad says happened the day that Nancy disappeared. Almost immediately, I found a big inconsistency in what Brad is saying when he talks about running to the store the morning Nancy disappeared. In the deposition here (around time marker 25:00), Brad talks about how his wife Nancy was upset that they were out of detergent.

    Questioner:
    When you got home from the Harris Teeter, what did you do?

    Cooper:
    When I got home from Harris Teeter, I put the milk back in the fridge. Um..by this time, the washing machine had finished the first load that, um, we had put in earlier, and um, Nancy then indicated that we were out of laundry detergent and was upset that we were out of laundry detergent as well.

    Questioner:
    Was she upset with you about that?

    Cooper:
    Yes, she… well, she was upset that one, we ran low on milk, we ran low on laundry detergent, and um, she was gone the week prior so she kind of felt it was my fault that I hadn’t restocked with milk and laundry detergent. (Time marker 25:18).

    Questioner:
    So what does she say?

    Cooper:
    She indicated that it was kind of my fault and therefore my responsibility and hop back in the car and go to the store and pick up laundry detergent.

  3. If you compare that to what Brad said in an affidavit here, Brad’s story has changed.

    “I start to get ready for the girls to get up and noticed we were out of laundry detergent and could not do laundry, so Nancy asked me to go back out to get some laundry detergent around 6:30 A.M.”

    I find this odd and perplexing. Why is Brad not able to keep his facts straight? In one version, his wife notices they are out of laundry soap. In the other, he notices. In the deposition, he starts the laundry and does one load. In the affidavit, he says he “could not do laundry”.

    This is a notable red flag. When we are honest, we remember the basic details of what we did and who discovered what. We don’t confuse basic facts such as this.

  4. It’s also very notable (above) that Brad talks about getting ready for the girls to “get up” in the affidavit. Yet oddly, in his deposition, he talks about how Katie, his daughter, was up early and fussing because she didn’t have milk, and that he went to get her milk, came home and got a bottle of milk to give to Katie. He wasn’t home a few minutes before the laundry detergent scenario played out, and after returning with the laundry detergent he tells us he takes Katie back upstairs with him to put her down.

    What is the truth here? Was Katie up or not? Clearly, Brad is having a hard time keeping his facts straight and that begs us to question why.

  5. It’s odd, too, that when Brad Cooper went to the grocery store the first time, he knew exactly how he got there. He was sure about his route. The second time, however, he couldn’t remember which way he went, yet he said he remembered getting a phone call at a specific intersection. Why did he take a different route? How come he remembers this specific phone call, but he doesn’t remember the different route? It’s perplexing. Notice that Brad is asked why he took a different route, but he doesn’t answer the question.
  6. Brad Cooper in this deposition tells us that he cleaned out the garage on June 28th so that one car could fit into their two car garage. He explains that it was summer and hot, and that Nancy needed a cool car for the kids.

    Yet ironically, Gary Beard, of Gary’s Pest Control, says in his affidavit that he entered the garage on July 8 and that there was no way a car could be parked inside the garage due to the toys and things Brad says he supposedly removed. It’s another inconsistency, another oddity, another red flag. Why would Gary Beard lie about this? Why would Brad Cooper lie about this?

At this point, from what little I have reviewed, I think it is clear that Brad is unable to keep his facts straight, and that concerns me.
_______________________________
Update:  Brad Cooper was sentenced to life in prison May 2011 for the killing of his wife, Nancy.

Arrest in Nona Dirksmeyer Case

Thanks to a reader, Joyce Ham, for informing me that there was an arrest Friday in the Nona Dirksmeyer case. On Friday police arrested a man, Gary Dunn, who lived in Dirksmeyer’s apartment complex at the time of her murder.

I originally wrote about the case in February of this year after Kevin Jones, Dirksmeyer’s boyfriend, was tried for her murder and acquitted. Even though Jones acquitted last July, public opinion was not supportive of Jones.

“…even after being acquitted, Jones continued to face public scrutiny in Pope County. Arkansas Tech denied him admission for the fall semester, because Jones said he didn’t send in proper transcripts and the school viewed him as a safety concern. (source)”

Many people did not believe justice was served. That’s when my reader’s wrote me, and asked me for my opinion.

The police found Jones’ behavior questionable and suspicious. Watch as police interrogate Jones here.

Furthermore, Jones had failed a polygraph, and police believe they had Jones DNA on the murder weapon.

Nona’s parents also made it very clear on 48 Hours as well that they believed Jones was Dirksmeyer’s killer, too. Yet a jury didn’t find enough evidence to convict Jones.

Upon watching Jones speak on 48 Hours, I knew without a doubt he was innocent. I had no doubts about it. This case is particularly pleasing to see come to light now because Jones is a good man who does not deserve this injustice.

I will be curious to see how this case plays out. In the end, you have to wonder if the DNA on the condom wrapper in Dirksmeyer’s apartment is what finally brought Dunn into focus. Only time will reveal the details as right now as the police are keeping the details mum.

Coralrose Fullwood Case

Click here for an update on this case 3-03-2009

News is breaking today about a case I have reviewed: The Coralrose Fullwood case. A man named Patrick Dewayne Murphy has been arrested and charged in the death of Coralrose.

I reviewed videos of Coralrose’s father, Dale, and when I watched him, I didn’t trust him. Yet I knew that in the police investigation, the police did not find any DNA evidence of Dale on his daughter. Yet, I still couldn’t explain Dale’s behavior.

Read moreInterestingly, the Herald Tribune reports today that…

“Despite the arrest, authorities say the investigation is far from over.”

“We believe that other people are involved,” said [North Port Police Chief] Lewis, who explained that by ‘involved,’ he means people who either helped commit the crime, or who knew about it.”

I don’t think we’ve seen the entire puzzle of this case unfold yet either.

In my post last June, I wrote:

Do I trust Dale? I absolutely do not trust Dale. Do I think he killed his little girl? I cannot say. Was he involved somehow? I suspect so because he isn’t telling us all he knows. In my opinion, Dale knows more than he is admitting to, sadly — and the implications of that are a little more than I can handle thinking about…

The question is was Fullwood somehow connected to Murphy?

TampaBays10: “There is a $10,000 reward for information about Murphy. Anyone with information can call Crimestoppers at (800) 780-TIPS or the Coralrose Fullwood Hotline at (941) 429-7336.”

What do you think?