Chris Watts Interview: My Thoughts

Many of you have wondering if Christopher Watts revealed clues that he was deceptive. The answer is yes. If you don’t know, he has sadly confessed to the killing of his wife and their children.

In the beginning of the interview, Chris actually glows when he first starts talking, yet he is putting on a down-tone in his voice and working hard to keep his emotions baseline. You get that deadpan feeling? That’s him manipulating his responses–trying to “act” down when he really isn’t. It’s an epic fail.

You can see him suppress a smile when he is asked what happened. It’s creepy. This is not a man grieving for or worried about his supposed missing wife.

When talking about her not responding to “her people” he talks about “That is what concerned a lot of peoples.” If you notice, it didn’t concern him. Isn’t that interesting? He also makes a disgust expression.

As he talks about coming home, he says, “Nothing. Just vanished. Nothing was here.” This is extreme distancing from his wife and kids. He acts like they are objects, not human beings who went missing. He then corrects and says, “She wasn’t here. The kids weren’t here.”

Interestingly, when he talks about the kids and says their names, you see a slow blink. There is some, albeit slight, emotional response here about the kids that is revealed by this. Does it bother him he killed them? Are their visions that get into his head that cause him to feel some emotion here? I believe the answer is yes, even if it is a minor emotion. With his wife, there is nothing.

When Chris spells Celeste’s name, he has an awkward swallow. It’s making him very uncomfortable and its notable.

As Chris talks about where they could be, he has a glow again. I get that sense he feels he is being believed and is successfully duping the reporter here. It’s very creepy. And it continues as he talks about the girls, and how they would be eating dinner and how he supposedly (not) misses it. He actually breaks out in slight laughter at 3:24. What you are seeing is a man who is loving the fact he is duping the reporter and getting away with his lies and thinks he is being believed.

He laughs again at 3:51.

He says they had an emotional conversation. Yeah, a fight. No doubt. He laughs again at 5:01.

When the reporters question him about what the police or sheriff are saying to you, he shows real indications of being uncomfortable and nervous again, which only helped investigators! He shows doubt throughout this interview as well.

And in the end, he says, as he pleas for his wife, “IF you are out there…” IF??? I love when they say “if”. It’s quite common and a huge reveal.

I personally suspect this man was controlling, angered easily and kept his demons behind closed doors. And something happened, and he snapped.

48 Hours: David Camm (re-run)

Eight months ago, I wrote about David Camm’s 3rd trial and him being set free. You can read about it here.

I do not believe David Camm and here are some of the reasons:

1. David Camm has not shown any genuine and real negative emotions about losing his wife and family to murder from day one in all the video I have seen of him over the years. He is as cold and blank as can be…

2. YET when David Camm is accused of sexual molesting his daughter, we see real emotion for the first time. THIS upsets David. We see stress in his forehead for the first time. I find that shocking. What’s weird about David Camm is that this seems to upset him more than the killing of his family. This is a “wow” moment for me.

4. We see very real emotions in David Camm when he gets set free, too–he seems to feel way more emotions for himself than he ever showed for his wife and family.

5. At the end of the show when David Camm said he didn’t want to share any memories of his wife because they are all he had left, I felt that was a cold and callous response. If he loved his wife, he would want to share how beautiful and special she was with the world because she was taken away way too early and so were his children, but he couldn’t do it. It was notable to me. Almost bitter. I cannot reconcile this.

Now imagine you are wrongly accused of murdering your family and of molesting your daughter. Which one would upset you most?

I think all people would feel more violated about being accused of killing three people versus and unsubstantiated sexual abuse claim, but not David Camm.

Read this excerpt from 48 Hours:

With Boney convicted, Camm was feeling better about his second trial, especially because the judge threw out the conspiracy charge. But he had to worry when he heard prosecutor Keith Henderson tell the jury about those unproven suspicions that Jill was molested.

Asked what it was like to hear those allegations, Camm told Schlesinger, “Now that — makes my blood boil,” he replied in 2013. “…that’s the one thing that really infuriates me, more than a lot of things.”

“Because?” Schlesinger asked.

“Because it’s not true and because it is so inflammatory,” Camm replied.

Wasn’t everything not true, if he was innocent??? Or was it only the molestation charge?

Camm sure makes you wonder, doesn’t he?

Twenty Percent of Drownings Could Be Homicides…

This is an interesting news clip from Chicago that talks about how drownings may actually be homicides and missed by detectives who are not trained in water recovery.  I found this fascinating.

There has been an abnormal number of young men who are in college who have drowned in the Chicago and Milwaukee area that I have noticed in the past 5-8 years and the trend deeply disturbed me. I have been suspicious of it for years and I am glad there are others who are too and are now taking a closer look at these deaths. I do not believe these were all accidental drownings.

Remains Identified as Caylee Anthony

Breaking news from CNN: The bones found last week are now confirmed to be those of Caylee Anthony.

How terribly sad. My heart aches for the Anthonys.

I forgot I wrote this on July 19th:

I did see some video footage of Casey online from Nancy Grace, and in that video Casey is gloating as the cameras pan on her as she is being led by police from one location to another (starting at time marker :05). Her eyes are glowing with excitement. She is clearly enjoying being in the spotlight, and being deceptive about her daughter.

Can we assume Casey killed her daughter? No, we can’t. A number of things could have happened to her daughter–many of which are horrible to think about, but Casey definitely knows the truth and she isn’t sharing it, and that doesn’t bode well for Caylee.

I don’t believe Casey accidentally killed Caylee. That glow that she had at that time was absolutely chilling. If she accidentally killed her daughter, she would not have felt this way. Add to that her rumored computer searches for breaking of the neck and for chloroform, and this case is bone chilling.

I personally think Casey was ultimately jealous of Caylee and her mom’s affection for Caylee. When Cindy wanted Casey to move out and inquired about getting custody of Caylee, Casey lost it, and decided to make her mom pay the ultimate price, as sick as that is to write. She obviously had no regard to Caylee whatsoever to do what she did.

Horvatt Makes Second Plea

View Video Here

I just find Horvatt’s smiles and positive emotions chilling at this supposed difficult time in his life. It doesn’t add up no matter how you slice it. I don’t see an ounce of sadness, loss, stress or difficulty on him whatsoever. I see glee, which is very disturbing.

To read my review of Horvatt’s first interview, click here.

I also found this video and I think what the Putman County Sheriff’s Major Gary Bowling said was very telling. He said:

What we’re trying to do here today is keep this in the public’s eye for another day or so, cause somebody saw something along state road 26. They either saw that vehicle, that red vehicle with the taillight missing and the bumper bent down, um dirty and junky looking, late 80s or maybe early 90s. Or, they may have seen Mr. Horvatt’s vehicle which is a late model, blue, Ford F150, and it has a wheelchair platform on the back…

We just want the public to know that the smallest thing they saw could be the biggest thing to us, and we really want some contact…

If the police believed there was a killer on the run, would they only give it another day or two? Also their plea to the public for anything even remotely small is quite informative too. I don’t think the police have missed this case at all. I suspect they are trying to build a very tight case before they arrest Horvatt.