Things are not looking good for the case against Drew Peterson. Could this be another Casey Anthony case where the majority of people know from behavior that Peterson is guilty, but he walks?
It doesn’t look good.
Click here to read my review of Drew Peterson in the Today Show interview shown in the clip above.
This is a fascinating story with a huge lesson. Time and time again I hear women who ended up in bad relationships say, “I know he lied, but it was harmless.” When people continually lie, it is one of the biggest warning signals you have that the person you are invested in a relationship, friend or otherwise, values themselves way more than you. And when a person puts them first, watch out! You will end up hurt, one way or another.
Lying repeatedly shows a lack of respect by the person who is lying and to the people being lied to. It will never end happily. And if you stick around, it shows you don’t respect yourself either. You should want more for your life!
It’s your number reason to boogie, folks. I have always had a steadfast rule in personal intimate relationships. If someone lies to me once, I’ll forgive them, if they are sincere and I truly believe their apology. If they lie to me twice, its over. It’s clear we didn’t learn from the first mistake and I am not going to repeat it again.
The only exclusion I have are friends who give me white lies when they cancel things, reschedule or are unable to be honest about their own shortcomings or difficulties, which have no bearing on me or other people.
Lies are not harmless when they continually repeat. Remember that…
This is a fascinating video of Norway victims after the horrible massacre there last week. Watch their facial expressions. What do you see?
Due to my busy schedule, I will be commenting with my replies in the comment section below.
By JelleS — Click on image to go to artist’s page.
What is today’s expression and what are the elements that tell you so?
Last week, I got a notice in the mail that said my dog was due for her rabies shot. I thought that was odd because we got her shots updated last summer, and I was under the impression it was a three-year shot. I have had some serious questions about my vet’s ethics lately, and so before I called, I decided to pull my records to double-check.
When I looked at the Certificate of Vaccination, I was surprised to see the date given and the expiration were only one year apart (not three). Yet when I read further down, it said that it was a three year vaccine. That was certainly sloppy work at best.
I then decided to call the vet office, and ask when my dog’s vaccine was due to see what they would say. She said, yes, it was due now.
This bothered me.
I told the woman I had the certificate of vaccination and it said three years. She said she had to check and that whatever my paper said didn’t matter–only her records mattered. She knew I was upset. She then came back on the line and confirmed that it was a three year vaccinate.
Do vets make documents like this on purpose to make extra money? If you don’t keep records, which a lot of people don’t, they can earn a lot of extra money at the expense of our pets. I would bet I am a rarity to check the facts and call on this, at which point the vet can then say, “Oh yeah, its three” without repercussions.
I find this very disappointing.
I’ve seen several things at this vet lately that concern me and are red flags. One was my name was sold to Frontline and I received advertising from Frontline saying that it was from my vet. It was clear my name was sold to that company–which disturbed me, too. Plus, I had another incident that is to complex to write about here. Three strikes and he’s out! Its time for a new vet!!
