Renee Ellory |  Eyes for Lies
  • Home
  • About
    • Articles
    • Media Appearances
    • Myths to Deception Detection
  • Services
    • Deception Detection & Credibility Training
    • Facial Profiling
      • The Science of Facial Profiling
    • Who has Renee trained?
  • Testimonials
    • Video Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Instagram

In Memory of Dr. Maureen O’Sullivan

July 23, 2010/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

I received unexpected and sad news today that Dr. Maureen O’Sullivan, the researcher who conducted the Wizards Project, which identified the 50 known Truth Wizards, passed away on May 10, 2010.

Dr. O’Sullivan and I met in 2006 when she came to visit me after I passed the “truth wizard” tests. She wanted to conduct further research on the project by studying what made me come to the conclusions I come to. I have fond memories of our time together and I snapped this photo so I could always remember the visit.

I value Dr. O’Sullivan’s contribution to science as it changed the direction of my life. She has left a lasting impact on me, and I hope her work is carried forward, as I believe it is very valuable to all people. Thank you, Dr. O’Sullivan, for all of your work. I hope one day, through hard work of my own, that I can leave behind something that touches people lives as deeply as you have.

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2010-07-23 22:04:002010-07-23 22:04:00In Memory of Dr. Maureen O’Sullivan

‘Truth wizard’ analyzes convicted Lemoore man

July 23, 2010/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

I was interviewed by a local crime reporter, who covered the Dave Hawk case in detail. I reviewed the interview of Dave Hawk that aired on Dateline this past week. Check it out.

You can read my original review of Dave Hawk before he was arrested in May 2007 here.

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2010-07-23 16:59:002010-07-23 16:59:00‘Truth wizard’ analyzes convicted Lemoore man

New Person of Interest in Horman Case

July 23, 2010/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

There is a new woman of interest in the disappearance of Kyron Horman. Her name is DeDe Spicher. She has been in close contact with Terri Horman since Kyron’s disappeared and news reports are saying that Spicher is telling people not to cooperate. Apparently, Spicher has been giving Terri Horman support and advice since Kyron went missing.

Join in Eyes for Lies forum to follow this case in greater detail…

To read my original thoughts on Terri Horman’s body language during her first press appearance, click here.

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2010-07-23 08:20:002010-07-23 08:20:00New Person of Interest in Horman Case

Are you color blind?

July 23, 2010/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies


Richard Wiseman does card trick, Youtube

Thanks, Johanna, for this video link. What is amazing to me, is not only that we don’t see things, its that the vast majority of us all act the same!

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2010-07-23 08:07:002010-07-23 08:07:00Are you color blind?

My Thoughts: Linda Dolloff’s 911 Call

July 22, 2010/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

When I listen to Linda Dolloff in the 911 call, these are my thoughts:

  1. I am amazed at how calm she is when she waits to the 911 operator start to speaking.
  2. I find when the 911 operator says what is your emergency, Linda doesn’t say someone tried to kill me! Or say someone just shot me! There is a stranger in my house! Help! Usually in emergencies, people give the most important details first. However, deceptive people often want to play down the important details so they don’t look suspicious, so other people can draw their own conclusions (hopefully reaching the RIGHT one), because it is hard to say an affirmative statement that is a lie.
  3. I immediately noticed that Linda says quite loudly and without any fear, “Somebody’s in my house.” She also says it TWICE. If someone is in her house, why isn’t she afraid he may come find her and kill her?? This is flat out inconsistent. We all have survival instincts, and hers aren’t kicking in, I suspect, for a reason.
  4. The way Linda says, “Somebody’s in my house” sounds like a whine to me. Listen to the end pronunciation how it drags as she says it. It’s notable.
  5. Why wouldn’t she give the police her numerical address? I would do that if I was worried, so I left nothing to chance. I would want the police there immediately. Does she hope this will stall them? Even if she is the only house on the street, why not be sure they don’t make an error?
  6. When the dispatcher says how do you know someone is in your house, it almost sounds like Linda laughs! Did you notice? She also doesn’t answer the question. A person in grave danger with a true intruder would know immediately why they suspect someone is in the house. This is flat out inconsistent. Linda says, “Oh god. I don’t know. My husband’s not responding.” That makes absolutely no sense!
  7. Then it appears she remembers what she wanted to say, “He shot me, he shot me” as an “afterthought”. Would you forget if someone shot you? It seems plausible to me that you might forget that you were shot, if you staged something and were “recreating the events,” however.

    We are only 15 seconds into this call, mind you. Lots of red flags…

  8. The dispatcher is totally taken back by Linda’s statement “He shot me.” He says “What?” This makes sense. Most people don’t forget to leave one of the most important details out! Most people, if they believed they were shot and can’t see, would typically fear they could die from their injuries, but not Linda. She seems to have no concern about her injuries, which I find very peculiar.
  9. When the dispatcher asks Linda if her husband shot her, she says very strangely “No, no! My husband, he is not answering me.” How could she be sure it wasn’t her husband? This is notable for me. Most people would say “I don’t know who shot me. It’s dark! I need help.”
  10. Linda never says she needs help, to get an ambulance, that she’s hurt. Why? Does she not want to draw attention to herself? This is very unusual.
  11. Linda’s crying in the background of the call when the dispatcher is relaying what he thinks happened to EMT sounds like a resigned cry, as if she is mourning something. When people cry in fear and panic, it is a very different cry.
  12. The EMT man asks her, “What happened”. Linda says she doesn’t know. She doesn’t know?? This is nonsense. She goes on to set her stage, again, if you ask me. She says, “I heard noises. I came down the hall. This loud bang and he dropped, somebody went… I don’t know, my husband, I haven’t….” If someone asked a shooting victim what just happened, and they knew they were shot, I would suspect the majority of them would say I was shot, and then give details.

    The fact Linda is so sparse on details flags me. Think of the reverse. If you staged something, it is hard to create details for something you didn’t experience.

  13. Linda also leaves off pronouns “…this loud bang”. She doesn’t say I heard this loud bang.
  14. Linda also says, “He dropped…” Then she says, “somebody went”. If she thinks this is a guy, she should stick to “he”, but she is changing her references, which is also inconsistent.
  15. The way she screams, “I don’t know”. It’s pure frustration. Why is she frustrated instead of scared? Why doesn’t she just admit, “I’m so confused”, if she is confused. She doesn’t tell us how she is feeling at all. Most people in her situation would be saying how scared they are. Not Linda.
  16. Linda says, “I crawled to the bedroom. I called and he’s not answering. He’s gurgling.”

    She tells us she did this before she called. No worry about an intruder, is there? She called many times without any concern of the intruder…Hmmm… If you heard your husband gurgling, would you make a 911 call in another room and just sit there listening, or would you go help him? Linda was on the phone with 911 for nearly 3 minutes, where she could have helped Jeff, but she didn’t.

  17. When the dispatcher asks if anyone is still there, Linda now says she doesn’t think so…her dog would be barking. Really? Why didn’t her dog barks alert her when the guy was there originally?? Did she ever talk of a dog bark?
  18. When the dispatcher tells her an ambulance is on the way, she has no urgency. She has no concern for her gurgling husband, does she? She doesn’t say hurry, get here quickly. My husband sounds like he is dying!! No, she doesn’t.
  19. It’s chilling to hear her sob “What do I do now?” I think most people would crawl to their husband to see if he is alive and if they can do anything.
  20. The dispatcher asks, “Did you see anything at all?” Linda replies, “It’s dark. It’s dark. It’s dark.” Why hasn’t she turned on the lights at this point?? Did she call 911 in the dark? Were there any lights on when the police arrived?
  21. The dispatcher continues, “Did you see anything?” Linda says, “No, just like, I don’t know. I don’t know.” You get the sense Linda doesn’t want to give any details here. It’s like she was going to and then she changed her mind. Why would she be guarded if she is a victim?
  22. Linda says, “What about my husband?” As if she has no responsibility to reach out to him… She heard him gurgling. She couldn’t have been that far away.
  23. You hear Linda in the 911 call call out to Jeff. “Jeff?….Jeff?” Why is she calling out to him instead of trying to get to him to help him in any way she can? It takes her almost 3 minutes into the call for her to go to him. We finally here her say, “Oh m god, are you alright?” I think most people would realize when someone is gurgling, they are not alright.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2010-07-22 11:14:002010-07-22 11:14:00My Thoughts: Linda Dolloff’s 911 Call
Page 162 of 263«‹160161162163164›»

NEW ONLINE TRAINING COMING SOON!
Get Notified of Future Courses

Renee Ellory has written this blog since 2006, dedicating her free time to help others understand people. By sharing her insights on human behavior, deception and the truth.

Many people have shared with Renee their personal stories of how her insight has greatly affected their lives. It definitely motivates Renee to continue to dedicate her time when she is available.

Renee tracked her accuracy publicly for 7.5 years, and was 95% accurate, whereas the average person is 54% accurate. She didn’t miss a case for five years sharing her thoughts before the truth was known! She is a scientifically tested and studied expert.

While she doesn’t track her cases anymore due to limited time, she still shares her opinions with the public when time allows.

Search

Search Search

Archives

Suggest a Topic

Recent Posts

  • Stress is the Great Unmasker. Use It. December 9, 2025
  • Do Liars Really Touch Their Nose More? Here’s the Truth. December 4, 2025
  • ChatGPT Told Me a Liar Was Telling the Truth—Here’s What It Missed.  December 1, 2025
  • ChatGPT Called a Liar “Honest” – Renee Reacts on Substack November 30, 2025
  • Pressure Testing an LLM: Hallucinations, Tone Drift, and the Cost of Lying Nicely April 16, 2025
Please note because this is blog is over a decade old some information has been lost in the multiple transitions between platforms. When you see a missing post or a post without comments, it was likely lost during a migration. Our sincerest apologies.

Thank you for visitiing!

Eyes for Lies | Renee Ellory

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top