Renee Ellory |  Eyes for Lies
  • Home
  • About
    • Articles
    • Media Appearances
    • Myths to Deception Detection
  • Services
    • Deception Detection & Credibility Training
    • Facial Profiling
      • The Science of Facial Profiling
    • Who has Renee trained?
  • Testimonials
    • Video Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Instagram

Seeing the Doctor

March 12, 2012/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

Doctor Hand

I recently went to the doctor for a checkup and explained some of my concerns to my doctor.  I have been having some issues over the past few years, and do keep a regular check on my health because my grandmother likely had something similar.  She died at the age of 51.  We know she had cancer, but we just don’t know which one. We just know the region of origin.

My doctor came highly recommended to me by a handful of medical doctors I have seen over the years. She is intelligent, smart, witty and seems very knowledgeable. She is also given decent reviews by patients, so I felt like I was in good hands.

I’ve been unfortunately cursed with some benign tumors and they continue to grow slowly (which is not abnormal for the tumor type) so I keep getting them looked at to make sure they don’t turn into cancer.  The risk is very, very remote– but I also need to watch to make sure nothing else develops, either.

During my last visit, my doctor suddenly said we should remove them and a whole lot more!  She got me really scared by her words.  Her exact words were that they were growing too fast, and she was “concerned….very concerned.” Naturally, we had talked about my grandmother and her cancer again — so it was clear she was telling me she was concerned about cancer.  And her recommended?  Radical surgery immediately.

I walked out of the office stunned. I didn’t see that coming at all. It even took me a few minutes to understand what she was saying because she didn’t come right out and say it until I laid it on the table–“Is this what you are saying?”  She confirmed.

I was blind-sided and scared and freaked out. It didn’t help that after I left her office, I went out into the middle of a snowstorm, where the roads were slick and my nervous hands struggled to keep my car on the road.

And the power died as soon as I got home for 4 hours so I couldn’t do any research to understand more about what was going on.

At first, in my emotional fear, I believed her. Emotions are our biggest cloud to seeing the truth there is–for all human beings–and I am no exception.

As I calmed down over the evening, and I started thinking, by morning I could verbalize the holes in her approach.  She was telling me she was very concerned because my tumors had grown, and fast growing tumors could be cancer, but if I wanted a second opinion (which I told her I did), she told me to see this conservative doctor who would probably make a different recommendation all together because of his beliefs.

I realized if she truly believed I was on the cancer track as she so scared me, would she believe another doctor would take a different approach? A doctor who believed in Western medicine like herself?  That didn’t make sense to me because I wasn’t arguing with her, disagreeing or asking for any form of alternative treatments. It would be one thing if I wanted to see an Eastern medicine specialist, but I wasn’t.

She also never said to me, “I’m very concerned this could be cancer.”   She never outright said it.  She stopped short. She connected things by reference, but never actually said it.  This bothered me. She never gave me statistical probabilities, either.  That bothered me.

I have read up on vast amounts of literature the past few weeks and found she left out a lot of information/options/procedures/risk factors, and if I simply trusted what she told me, I would have been woefully mislead.  Her end diagnosis may be where I end up, but she didn’t take the prudent steps to ensure it was the right decision.

I’ve found out by ordering my medical records from her office that my tumors have not grown fast at all. They’ve actually slowed in their growth rate!!  The day I left her office in a panic, I asked her how many tumors I had now, because she said I had more than the last time.  She told me, “More than 5 — they stopped counting!”  My records show ONLY 3, with a possible forth.  And one could be 2, but there was no mention of five definitely, or that they stopped counting. This was another blatant lie!
 
I also discovered in her medical record of my visit that there was no mention of cancer whatsoever, or any concerns.  What she did was write down her notes as if I came in complaining and wanted a “solution”–and so she offered me options.  I couldn’t believe it.  Why do I still get surprised?  What she did was write down my concerns, but she took great liberty in grossly misrepresented them –making them much worse than what I said they were, which gives her the justification for recommending the surgery.  So what we discussed and what she actually wrote down were two entirely different conversations.

Also, during my exam, as we chatted, she asked me what I was up to lately and I told her about my training for law enforcement.  Guess what she wrote on her report?  That I worked for the FBI.  I never said that and you all know I do not work as a employee of the FBI.  Another inaccurate piece of information.  Her medical records hit me as “cover-your-ass” paperwork because it had nothing about our real visit in it!

In her report, she wrote about how she offered me all these different treatment options–for which she offered only 2 — and lied about one of the two.  She told me of two surgeries that were available, and only guided me towards one saying the other could not be done completely (where tumors would remain)–which is an outright lie!! It could be done completely and curatively but differently than she told me.  It would take a specialist surgeon to do it, however, and it wouldn’t be her! I don’t believe she had the skill.  She also wrote that she advised me of all the risks — which she advised me of none!

I can see if I took her to court (which I have no intention), I’d like look the nut job by her records. 

It was a very stressful and disappointing experience to say the least.

I went ahead and scheduled a consultation with a top-notch surgeon and expert in the area of my concern tomorrow at the University of Chicago.

I’m really nervous and scared because I don’t know where it is all going to go, but I need good and trustworthy answers.  This doctor has been given award after award and is highly regarded nationally, but this time, I’m well read, educated and ready to ask him 1000 questions, if need be.  No one is going to mislead me when it comes to my health!  I know all the potentials where this could go and I’m ready to get trustworthy answers. I want to know which option is best for me, and WHY.

If I don’t post for a few days, please understand why.  I’m going through a lot right now.

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2012-03-12 13:07:002012-03-12 13:07:00Seeing the Doctor

Who is Anderson’s Cousin? The Clues

March 1, 2012/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies


The Clues I Saw:

When I watched Anderson talk about his 5th cousin once removed, as soon as they showed them, I looked to see who looked like Anderson. The woman in the middle clearly did, and even though that wasn’t anything concrete because the distance of their relationship, it was a consideration.  The middle woman had fair skin and a similarly shaped face to Anderson.  She also had his demeanor.

Anderson continued, “Each [woman is] wearing a t-shirt that says I’m Anderson’s cousin.” 

I immediately honed into the middle woman again because her behavior made sense.  She struggled to keep eye contact and while that is not the clue (lack of eye contact), it made sense and here is why:

Imagine that you are the cousin and Anderson has to guess who you are.  The last thing you want to do on national TV is blow your cover and make it easy on Andersen, right?  I mean if you did that, you’d feel like a totally fool!  So, with that, what are you going to do?  You are not going to be like “Pick me!  Pick me!  Like woman number one.  Heck no!  You are going to be more reserved and less obvious because the last thing you want to do is ruin the game on national TV.

I would also expect Anderson’s cousin to be nervous because of what I just stated above.  Number 2 certainly fits that as well.

When Anderson asks, “How long have your ancestors been in the U.S.?”  woman number one thinks first.  She says, “Hmmm….”  That was a red flag for me.  When she says 1884, she squints her eyes almost in a critical gesture of “Are you buying it?”. That doesn’t fit.

Number two says, “Early 1600s.”  She says it in a very controlled manner.  She also swings her leg that shows she’s nervous and nervous here makes sense.  Because if it is her, she has the most to lose if she blows her cover!

Number three is neutral to me.  She could go either way at this point, though I am leaning toward the middle one.

When Anderson asks, “Do any of your ancestors come from the south?” the first woman blows it big time on multiple fronts.  She says, “Yes, funny you should ask….uh, North Carolina.”  The “funny you should ask” stands out as odd to me, but when she hesitates with “uh” and then says North Carolina in the tone of a question–its a dead give away she’s lying.

Number two is playing it coy again.  She simply says, “Yes they do.”  That make sense and is another point for her. Number three is still into play as well, but my gut says no at this point.

Remember this is not a high-stake scenario so it is much more difficult to call, without question.  There is no pressure on the two liars in all reality.

Anderson called it correct when he said, “It makes me believe the open one is lying.”    For the reasons I stated above, this is true!

When Anderson talks about going prematurely gray, the first one is clearly thinking on her feet as she answers about big blue eyes.  When number two answers, she is calm as a cucumber this time.  She’s gained her footing!  Her answer flows and feels sincere to me.

As they keep talking about which one it is–look who is breathing the hardest–its number two!!  And who would be the most nervous–Anderson’s cousin.

The woman with the most points –whose behavior and words match who she is supposed to be — is number two!

I hope you enjoy this fun exercise 🙂  Thanks, Anderson!

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2012-03-01 12:19:002012-03-01 12:19:00Who is Anderson’s Cousin? The Clues

Tanya Perdomo Speaks about Missing Husband

February 28, 2012/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

<a href="http://www.bing.com/videos/browse?mkt=en-us&amp;vid=27e87816-c2fc-4ae9-87e7-4baaf4fdfb0a&amp;from=&amp;src=v5:embed::" target="_new" title="RAW VIDEO: Tanya Perdomo Speaks Out">Video: RAW VIDEO: Tanya Perdomo Speaks Out</a>

Tanya Perdomo’s husband, Jerry, went missing while on a trip to supposedly help a friend in Maine move, says his wife. When Tanya talks about where her husband went and what he went to do–she strangely doesn’t know. I’m not buying it.  She is withholding information, if you want my opinion.

She is very evasive and emotionally flat.

Tanya is very uncomfortable and seems to be thinking as she speaks. She also isn’t showing stress or concern or worry about her husband, which I find odd in this interview.

I question if she and her husband were into illegal activities–hence why she is vague and doesn’t want to talk about things. You wouldn’t go to a press conference and say my husband was doing something illegal, blah, blah, blah. You’d be vague and evasive, just as she is.

Fact checking for this post, I just saw that police have arrested a suspect for Jerry’s murder, though no body has been found. Police believe drugs were involved and that Jerry has been killed. Read more here:

Firefighter was killed in drug related murder

I suspect that Tanya knew what Jerry was up to and where he was going. She may not have known he had an affair and may not have wanted many details, but she knew the purpose of his trip, if you ask me.  

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2012-02-28 22:17:002012-02-28 22:17:00Tanya Perdomo Speaks about Missing Husband

Expression of the Day

February 23, 2012/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

Ainara portafotos


Genuine (sincere smile) or not?



https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2012-02-23 09:57:002012-02-23 09:57:00Expression of the Day

Most Memorable Lie Told to You

February 22, 2012/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

Carissimo Pinocchio

What is the most memorable lie someone told you?

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2012-02-22 16:35:002012-02-22 16:35:00Most Memorable Lie Told to You
Page 89 of 263«‹8788899091›»

NEW ONLINE TRAINING COMING SOON!
Get Notified of Future Courses

Renee Ellory has written this blog since 2006, dedicating her free time to help others understand people. By sharing her insights on human behavior, deception and the truth.

Many people have shared with Renee their personal stories of how her insight has greatly affected their lives. It definitely motivates Renee to continue to dedicate her time when she is available.

Renee tracked her accuracy publicly for 7.5 years, and was 95% accurate, whereas the average person is 54% accurate. She didn’t miss a case for five years sharing her thoughts before the truth was known! She is a scientifically tested and studied expert.

While she doesn’t track her cases anymore due to limited time, she still shares her opinions with the public when time allows.

Search

Search Search

Archives

Suggest a Topic

Recent Posts

  • Stress is the Great Unmasker. Use It. December 9, 2025
  • Do Liars Really Touch Their Nose More? Here’s the Truth. December 4, 2025
  • ChatGPT Told Me a Liar Was Telling the Truth—Here’s What It Missed.  December 1, 2025
  • ChatGPT Called a Liar “Honest” – Renee Reacts on Substack November 30, 2025
  • Pressure Testing an LLM: Hallucinations, Tone Drift, and the Cost of Lying Nicely April 16, 2025
Please note because this is blog is over a decade old some information has been lost in the multiple transitions between platforms. When you see a missing post or a post without comments, it was likely lost during a migration. Our sincerest apologies.

Thank you for visitiing!

Eyes for Lies | Renee Ellory

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top