Renee Ellory |  Eyes for Lies
  • Home
  • About
    • Articles
    • Media Appearances
    • Myths to Deception Detection
  • Services
    • Deception Detection & Credibility Training
    • Facial Profiling
      • The Science of Facial Profiling
    • Who has Renee trained?
  • Testimonials
    • Video Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Instagram

Robert Murat: What are you thinking?

September 14, 2008/1 Comment/in unsolved crime/by Eyes for Lies

A reader asked me my opinion on Robert Murat last week, and kindly provided me with some very good video links.

I was always curious about Robert Murat because I never saw him speak, but he spoke publicly in late July. Here is his interview. You can watch him on video, or read the transcript which I also provide (below).

Did you know that Murat has been cleared of his suspect “arguido” status like the Kate and Gerry McCann?

Watch Robert Murat Speak Here
Murat wants arquido explanation
BBC News

Murat:
I would like to know … ah… why… um… uh… I was made an arguido…ah..because ah, sincerely, I don’t understand I… why I was made an arguido. Um…yeah, I would like to find out. I would like to find out.

Reporter:
Would there be satisfaction or anger… (inaudible…if you understand this please send me the text).

Murat:
Well, I can’t really answer that because, ah, they may have, …they may have had, um…………they may have felt, should I say, that…that there was a reason to do it, and if there’s a justifiable reason to make me an arguido, um, then… I have to look at it and be sensible about it. Um, it doesn’t help in anyway shape or form, me, um, here, 14 months down the line, ah, still an arguido, but that is the law of Portugal. Now this happened in Portugal and as much as we do not like how the legal system works in Portugal, this is their legal system and they are doing their job.

Read moreThis interview is a real hair-raiser for me. The day I saw it, I had to get up and walk away. It really bothered me.

Five days before the date of the above video (and transcript), Murat won a lawsuit against the press for libel, and spoke out. He said “The newspapers in this case brought about the total and utter destruction of mine and my families life, and caused immense distress“. Notice how he reads from a script?

This makes absolute sense if Murat is a victim here, and was unjustly looked at for a crime he didn’t commit.

Fast forward five days (in this video), Murat confirms he is still being looked at as an “arguido” though news was already circulating that he would likely be cleared in the near future. With that, Murat tells us he wants to know why he was made an arguido.

Naturally, we should expect the same response in this video as when Murat talked about the libel suit. After all, if the police inaccurately labeled him an arguido, this is what caused the media frenzy, and ultimately what would have caused the destruction of Murat’s life, and where his deepest wounds and anger would reside.

With that, we should see a man who is feeling violated, misunderstood and unjustly treated. Is this what we see when we watch Murat speak here?

Absolutely not.

What we see, instead, is a man who is enjoying the spotlight. You’d think in this interview that Murat was sitting down for an afternoon tea, and not a serious conversation about how his life was ruined. He is enjoying speculating and bantering about this whole scenario as if it had no implications for him, yet he readily acknowledges he is still a suspect. Look at how he smirks and grins.

More importantly, we don’t see any distress, or feelings of violation. We don’t see anger for all the pain he has supposedly had to endure. We don’t see a hint that this is a man who was wrongly looked at, put under the microscope, called a suspect and had his life destroyed as he says himself.

I am flabbergasted to say the least. His behavior is a complete contradiction to the circumstances that he wants us to believe here. It is totally different than the script he read out to the media after he won his libel suit, but it shouldn’t be.

It’s one thing not to be bothered by the entire frenzy and to ignore it because he knows he is innocent, and that the police couldn’t possibly have anything on him. It’s quite another to tell us it devastated his life and to go after the press, but to then turn around and act like it was no big deal, and entertain that if the Portuguese police had reason to call him a suspect that they are just “doing their job” and that he should be “sensible” about it, is absurd.

It’s flat out pompous.

If the police inaccurately labeled you a suspect, would you ever entertain such nonsense?

I can’t believe I am even seeing this arrogance.

Is that how you would feel if you have been wrongly looked at as a suspect for an entire year? After the police searched your house multiple times? After your life was supposedly ruined, and the media trashed your name around the world?

If shoddy detective work destroyed your life, was inaccurate or faulty, I can be 100% confident in saying that you’d never go there. It defies logic. It’s like asking the devil to take a closer look at you and beat you, unjustifiably, just one more time.

What injured man does this? Is Murat really a victim here?

Look at this sentence:

I can’t really answer that because, ah, they may have, …they may have had, um…………they may have felt, should I say, that…that there was a reason to do it…

When you watch Murat speak here, he is talking naturally up until he says the words “they may have…” At that point, something stops him. You can clearly see his thought process stop and hesitate, and then he switch gears.

Was Murat actually thinking the police may have had reason or evidence to call him a suspect? Is he curious because he wants to know what they have, knowing they haven’t had enough to charge him in 14 months?

If there is one person on this earth who should never have doubts about Murat’s innocence, it should be Robert Murat himself. Instead he is playing the “What if game…” with us.…begging us to look at him closer.

It gives me the chills, that’s for sure.

It’s a cockiness at a level that I don’t recall seeing before. It’s downright arrogant and flippant, like someone who thinks they are smarter than everyone.

Has Murat outsmarted the system? It sure makes you wonder…

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2008-09-14 15:37:002008-09-14 15:37:00Robert Murat: What are you thinking?

Cool Website on Emotions and Expressions

September 10, 2008/in artnatomy, Emotions, facial expressions/by Eyes for Lies

If you haven’t heard of Artnatomy, then you are missing it!

ARTNATOMY/ARTNATOMIA is a flash interactive English/Spanish tool. It is intended to facilitate the teaching and learning of the anatomical and bio-mechanical foundation of facial expression morphology.

If you have interest in understanding facial expressions and emotions, it’s quite fascinating. It’s complex and in depth, but fun to experiment with!

Once you follow the link, click on Artnatomy in the top tabs, and then click on Application. To start out with, click on Level II.

Enjoy!

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2008-09-10 12:15:002008-09-10 12:15:00Cool Website on Emotions and Expressions

Temporary Moderation

September 9, 2008/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

I think by now you all know I hate to moderate things, but when a serial spammer comes to visit, I will absolutely do it. Some gaming company or gaming “something” is trying to sell their product and overnight must have left 20 comments linking to their game!

So until this passes, I will have moderation on, but I will approve all comments unless there is profanity.

9-11-08:
Turning off moderation. Let’s hope they’re gone!

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2008-09-09 09:46:002008-09-09 09:46:00Temporary Moderation

Josephine Frenna

September 7, 2008/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

Josephine Frenna went missing on August 21, 2008, and was found dead three days later, yet her family says Frenna didn’t swim.

“Josephine wasn’t a water person,” family friend Steve Stabile told the Herald. “She wasn’t one to go swimming on the beach. She hated the sand. She wouldn’t even put a toe in the swimming pool.” (Fox News)

The day after Frenna disappeared, she and her ex-husband were to appear in court. Frenna had a restraining order against her ex-husband, Gerardo Di Marco, and court records show she called him “violent” and “dangerous”. Frenna said she and her 13-year-old son had feared for their lives.

Yet in a twist, Frenna’s belongings were discovered on the beach (sandals, towel, keys to her condo) in front of where she lived by either a building worker or a woman on the beach (reports vary), and nothing seemed out of place in her condo.

Police are saying that there was no evidence of trauma to Frenna’s body, but they aren’t ruling out foul play.

With that, if you see Gerardo Di Marco talk about his wife and her disappearance, please let me know. I’d like to see Di Marco speak.

“Detectives have not determined whether the drowning was an accident, or even how and where Frenna got into the water. They’re awaiting surveillance video footage from buildings near her condo at 4020 Galt Ocean Drive, and toxicology results from an autopsy, said Sgt. Frank Sousa, Fort Lauderdale police spokesman. (SunSentinel.com).

Anyone with information is asked to call Broward Crime Stoppers at 954-493-8477

Source: ABC News
________________

KNOW OF A MISSING PERSON’S CASE?
HAVE A GOOD NEWS STORY?

I am always looking for new stories. If you know of a missing person’s case or any other case where you wonder what the truth is, and there are videos or audio of the family members or suspects talking about the case online, post a comment below.

Do know I am not psychic. I need to see the person or people speak about the situation in question for me to give you an opinion. You should provide a link to applicable online videos. If videos are more than 5 minutes in length, please indicate time marker where people speak about the case. Cases should be recent or within the recent past. I do not look at old cold cases.

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2008-09-07 18:04:002008-09-07 18:04:00Josephine Frenna

Emotions & Facial Expressions

September 5, 2008/in Emotions, facial expressions/by Eyes for Lies

A reader wanted to share with me a case that was profiled on A&E, and now on YouTube. It was the case of Mary Beth Davis. She told me I just had to see this woman’s facial expressions.

She was right.

This woman’s facial expressions and emotions are all over the charts, and exceptionally haunting in the first 15 seconds of this video alone.

Davis’ anger and seething hate are simply incredible!

If Davis doesn’t make your heart pound and give you a desire to flee, I don’t know what will!

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2008-09-05 18:45:002008-09-05 18:45:00Emotions & Facial Expressions
Page 413 of 498«‹411412413414415›»

NEW ONLINE TRAINING COMING SOON!
Get Notified of Future Courses

Renee Ellory has written this blog since 2006, dedicating her free time to help others understand people. By sharing her insights on human behavior, deception and the truth.

Many people have shared with Renee their personal stories of how her insight has greatly affected their lives. It definitely motivates Renee to continue to dedicate her time when she is available.

Renee tracked her accuracy publicly for 7.5 years, and was 95% accurate, whereas the average person is 54% accurate. She didn’t miss a case for five years sharing her thoughts before the truth was known! She is a scientifically tested and studied expert.

While she doesn’t track her cases anymore due to limited time, she still shares her opinions with the public when time allows.

Search

Search Search

Archives

Suggest a Topic

Recent Posts

  • Stress is the Great Unmasker. Use It. December 9, 2025
  • Do Liars Really Touch Their Nose More? Here’s the Truth. December 4, 2025
  • ChatGPT Told Me a Liar Was Telling the Truth—Here’s What It Missed.  December 1, 2025
  • ChatGPT Called a Liar “Honest” – Renee Reacts on Substack November 30, 2025
  • Pressure Testing an LLM: Hallucinations, Tone Drift, and the Cost of Lying Nicely April 16, 2025
Please note because this is blog is over a decade old some information has been lost in the multiple transitions between platforms. When you see a missing post or a post without comments, it was likely lost during a migration. Our sincerest apologies.

Thank you for visitiing!

Eyes for Lies | Renee Ellory

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top