Matt Baker on 48 Hours: What Are The Odds?
/in 48 Hours/by Eyes for LiesThe Matt and Kari Baker story was on 48 Hours this past Saturday. The show was titled The Preacher’s Wife. If you aren’t familiar with the story, you can read my first post on the case here. You can also watch the show online here.
I think most people see clearly that what Matt says compared to what others say just doesn’t add up. It doesn’t take eyes for lies to see this.
Unfortunately, 48 Hours gives us a fair amount of talk time with Matt, but they don’t show his face through a lot of it, which I find very unfortunate. If he makes any good expressions, we don’t get to see them. What we do see of Matt emotionally is not consistent with a man who supposedly loved his wife. Matt shows a faint, subtle smile from time to time that I find absolutely eerie and inappropriate.
Read moreThe first time he does it is at the end of the intro to the show. Matt says “My name is Matt Baker, and I have been accused of murdering my wife. It’s so unprobable [sic]. It’s not who I am. I loved my wife. I never hurt her a day in my life.” At the end, he is grinning. Did you see it?
The second time I see this subtle grin is when he talked about Kari having almost two personalities. There is absolutely no reason for Matt to be feeling any positive emotions at this time. It’s a complete contradiction to his circumstances. I am only part way through the video at this time, so there may be more examples of this that I have yet to document. I also find the word “almost” interesting as well. You either believe something or you don’t. You don’t almost believe.
Matt wants people to believe Kari acted one way around him because she was grieving, but another way around everyone else. People who are unstable or depressed don’t pick and choose when to display it. They are either unstable and depressed across the board, or they are not.
Matt even tries to tell us that she lost it, and flipped out while he was driving with her in the car one day. He says that she opened the car door because she needed to “get air” when they were moving, and that he had to rescue her by grabbing her waistband. Isn’t it ironic that Kari only flipped out around him, and no one else?
I think on ABC’s 20/20, Matt said they were going around 35 miles an hour, if I remember right. I think he said “not that fast”. Now on 48 Hours, he says they were going 45-50 mph. That’s an interesting change of facts. Wouldn’t Kari be even more insane to open the car door at faster speeds?
I wonder if the doctor will testify that Kari truly was hyperventilating, as Matt says prior her trying to “get air” on the way home in the car. I suspect it is unlikely.
I personally believe Matt is coming up with stories to make us think Kari was unstable. But if she was truly unstable, it would have spilled out in front of her parents, friends, and co-workers, but none of these people ever speak of being witness to any such behavior. In fact, they seem to report a totally different person than what Matt reports.
I also find it extremely strange that Kari wanted to drink on a queasy stomach. Who does this? I personally think this is absolute nonsense. I wonder if they tested her blood for alcohol?
I also don’t buy Matt’s story that Kari wasn’t feeling well, and yet she wanted him to go gas up the car and rent a movie. If you don’t feel well, you don’t send your husband out at 11 pm, and you don’t stay up until 3 a.m. watching movies. Did Matt just need an excuse to leave the house?
Also, Matt told two different stories of what he did when he last saw Kari alive. The last time you see your spouse alive is usually burned into your memory. Obviously, it is not burned into Matt’s memory. One time, Matt told Erin Moriarty of 48 Hours that when he left Kari to rent the movies, Kari was sleeping. “She had rolled back over and gone to sleep. So when I left, she was asleep.”
Two months prior, he had told Moriarty that he kissed her on the cheek. Which story is it? Why does Matt keep getting his facts confused over and over, if he is telling the truth?
Matt also says something very strange when he says, “…as I am calling 911, I’m deciding I don’t want them to see her naked. So I put her clothes on.”
This is exceptionally bizarre.
Most people only have one concern when a loved one is near death, dying, or has just died. It is hope to try to revive them. In a time of crisis, we don’t have room for any other thoughts! But Matt doesn’t even think about this when he is on the phone with 911 from what we hear. Instead, he worries about his naked wife. It’s absolute rubbish.
Also, was he trying to put her clothes on when he was on the phone with 911? Is there support of this on the audio tape? Does he breathe heavy or labored?
He also says when he was on the phone, he was moving Kari to the floor to do CPR. Does this make any sense? I don’t believe you have to have to be on the floor to do CPR, do you? I also wonder if there is any sounds of exertion on the 911 call to support Matt’s story of moving Kari while on the phone? Or did Kari end up on the floor another way?
Also, the police find a bottle of Unisom next to Kari’s bed, which is completely empty outside of two pills on the dresser. On autopsy, wouldn’t you expect they would find pill remnants in Kari’s stomach? Yet oddly, there is no mention of pill remnants in her stomach or GI tract, just traces in her muscle tissue. Would that trace in her muscle tissue be enough to be considered lethal?
I also find the typed suicide note exceptionally unusual as well. Why would one type it and not sign it? Why would it only be a few sentences ? Women are word warriors! Most women would also be very conscious not to commit suicide naked. Women are self-conscious of their bodies. I don’t know of one women who would choose to go this way, if they had a choice. I will review the suicide note in an upcoming posting.
Kari’s former grief counselor’s account doesn’t support Matt’s story, either. She said Kari wasn’t upset about Kassidy’s death as Matt says. Three days before she died, the counselor says Kari was worried that Matt was having an affair, and she was afraid he was trying to kill her.
What are the odds?
Kari also told her friend Jill that she was worried about an affair, and Jill corroborates this on 48 Hours as well.
Who is corroborating Matt’ story?
What are the odds that Kari would find “crushed pills” in Matt’s briefcase, and then die shortly thereafter with an empty bottle of pills, yet with no remnants in her stomach?
What are the odds that Matt would have an unusual relationship with a young single woman named Vanessa at the same time Kari was afraid he was having an affair?
What are the odds that Matt would talk to Vanessa within days after Kari’s death for 28 hours in ten days, if she was only a friend?
What are the odds he would give Vanessa Kari’s cell phone to use after her death, if she was only a friend?
What are the odds he would also be seen in a jewelry store looking at jewelry with Vanessa within days of Kari’s death, if she was only a friend?
The odds are one-in-a-million, and certainly don’t support the story that Matt wants us to believe.
Also, take Matt’s computers. Amazingly, his office computer was switched with his secretary and his just vanished. And even more perfect in timing, his hard drive on his home computer just went kaput, and is no longer working. The odds are getting ridiculous, if you ask me.
Furthermore, Matt wants us to believe he is the perfect husband and dad, doting on his children while Kari was lost in her abyss, and mourning over Kassidy–seven years after Kassidy’s death. It’s just over-the-top.
Matt talks of bathing the children, reading to them, putting them to bed, but when he is confronted about allegations that he inappropriately came on to young girls and women, he flat out denies it. Kari’s aunt Kay corroborates this with a story of her daughter, as does a woman from Matt’s college days on 48 Hours. Lora Wilson says 17 years ago Matt grabbed her, and made inappropriate sexual advances on her.
Matt’s story? He simply turned off the lights and scared Lora. Does that seem logical? He admits to knowing Lora as well as to scaring her, but of course, in Matt’s version of events, he was totally innocent again. He says, according to 20/20, it was just a ” fantasy of a hysterical coed.”
What are the odds?
ABC News show 20/20 say they documented six other complaints against Matt.
“20/20” documented six other complaints against Matt: from a female custodian from the First Baptist Church of Waco, who says he grabbed her sexually; a teenage girl from the same church who claimed he spoke to her in a sexually provocative manner; and at the YMCA where he supervised the day camp, four young women complained to management of improper sexual conduct (source).
Are these people all crazy like Kari was?
What are the odds?
Matt also gets caught up in another lie. He says he never blamed Kari for Kassidy’s death, but an e-mail which has surfaced from Matt to Kari that says the following “I know deep down I hold a grudge against God and you for Him answering your prayer and not mine. In some ways, I do hold you…to blame for her death.”
At Kari’s funeral, the grief counselor confronted Matt about the fact that Kari thought he was going to kill her, and Matt’s response on 48 Hours as he tells the story is interesting. He says “And I said, ‘What? Well, wait, wait, wait. ‘ And I’m like, what is going on here?”
Is that how you would respond to something like this? Why would you ever say “wait, wait, wait”? Most people would say that’s ridiculous and would just walk away. It would be adding insult to a serious injury. They wouldn’t even entertain the thought or dignify a response because it would be so far-fetched. It would be a ridiculous slap in the face!
But Matt does entertain it, and he seems to want to defend it when he says “wait, wait, wait.” You usually say “wait”, or “wait a minute” to people when you have something to explain or justify. It’s a notable response that is out of the ordinary if he was blind-sided by something he knew he had nothing to do with. I find his response hair-raising, to say the least.
Another contradiction in Matt’s story is when he talks about how Kari’s outlook about her new job. He doesn’t say she was excited. He says she was “nervous” and feeling sick. But Kari’s friend, Todd, says when he talked to her the day she died, she was “excited”. Someone who is going to commit suicide isn’t excited about a job prospect if they have no intention of taking it, are they?
Matt also got his facts mixed up about the first time he saw the suicide note. “The police officer brings me the note, and that was the first thought at the point in time, she took her own life.”
But on the 911 call, Matt says, “I think my wife just committed suicide….and her lips are blue, her hands are cold, and there’s a note that says, “I’m sorry, ‘basically.”
This is not a case where you need eyes for lies to decipher the truth. You need good old common sense.
What are the odds?
Article: Facing Up to Lies
/in Articles on Deception/by Eyes for LiesHere is an interesting article from Nova Scotia News. I found it today which searching for news on Karissa Boudreau, but it appears there is no news at this time.
Christine Francisco
/in unsolved crime/by Eyes for LiesBack on February 13th, Christine Francisco waited for her husband to come home from work to make Valentine’s Day cookies with their children, but Christine’s husband, Nicholas, never came home.
It has now been several months since Nicholas just walked out of work never to be seen again, but there are still no leads for police to follow. While his car was found in a condo parking lot that has no previous known connection for the Franciscos, there was also no sign of foul play discovered by police.
Christine, however, has maintained from the beginning that something sinister had to have happened to Nicholas because he was not the type of guy to just walk out of their lives. She says he was not a coward.
Read moreI watched several videos of Christine talk about Nicholas’ disappearance, and I find Christine’s behavior peculiar.
The first video where Christine spoke to the news is dated February 16, 2008. In this video, Christine appears to be crying, yet I do not see any tears. She says:
“I am begging everybody, everybody to please, please help find my husband because I can’t live my life without him.”
The first notable thing I see is a lack of tears falling from Christine’s eyes, yet Christine acts like she is crying, and even wipes her face as if there were tears.
The second notable point for me here is Christine’s tone-of-voice. It doesn’t sound distressed, upset, or concerned. Instead, it sounds whiny–like she is complaining. It also sounds notably different that in her video interviews with Nancy Grace and Greta Van Susteren. Usually when people are distraught and upset, they sound consistent.
I also found it odd how she says the following:
“If you can’t find him, these kids don’t have a daddy, then this unborn baby won’t have a daddy.”
Notice she says if you can’t find him. Where is her connection to the search? I find the word you an odd word choice. Most people would say if we can’t find him. “We” have to find him.
The second video I looked at was Christine talking to Greta Van Susteren.
Greta says, “Did you get the sense that anything unusual was going on in his life?” Listen to Christine’s response. She holds back laughter when she replies, “Not at all.” When she continues, notice how normal she acts, like she is talking about a PTA meeting or something. “He sounded so excited to come home, and he was ready to go with the cookies.”
As she continues her conversation with Greta, she shows absolutely no emotion, and no concern.
Greta asks Christine if Nicholas was having any personal problems at work, and Christine holds back laughter again. She smirks, lets out a sigh and replies “Not that I’m aware of.”
Why does Christine feel the need to laugh? Is it nerves, or something more sinister?
Greta then questions Christine about financial problems. Watch Christine when she says “We are not in poverty…we’re just in the middle”. Watch how animated she is…she teeters her head from side-to-side to gesture when she says “in the middle”. This shows she is relaxed. There is no hint of sadness, or concern whatsoever. If you didn’t know what Christine was talking about here, you’d think she was just having a casual conversation about gardening or something.
When people are worried or concerned, they are usually subdued in their reactions, and are less likely to gesture like this–especially about unimportant things like financial status when someone could be in danger. That’s because their one and only focus is to bring back their loved one.
Greta then questions Christine about when she first got suspicious something wasn’t right. Christine says she was concerned when Nicholas wasn’t home to make cookies–about eight o’clock which is the children’s bedtime, but she figured she was just overreacting and ignored it. I thought that was a little strange.
If Nicholas was going to make cookies with the children, wouldn’t she be expecting him earlier than the children’s bedtime? By bedtime, wouldn’t you feel justifiably alarmed?
When Christine talks about Nicholas not being home by 10 pm, she also says she was “absolutely petrified”, yet when she recollects this, she strangely shows no emotion again.
When people recollect a terrifying time, they display the fear of that moment on their faces, if only for a second. Our emotions are closely tied to our memories. Yet for Christine, this doesn’t seem to be true. She just chats as if nothing were wrong. It’s very strange.
Christine smiles again when she says it was very peculiar for him to be at the condominium complex. Why does she smile like this over and over again? Her emotions aren’t adding up with a woman who is fearful her husband is in trouble. Where is the fear??
When Greta says “What do you think happened to him? Where do you think he is?”, watch Christine. First she grins. Then she looks up before speaking which is an indication that she is thinking, not talking from her heart about how she feels. Then she speaks about herself in third person which is odd.
Instead of saying “My intuition tells me…” She says “Ummm…ah…a wife’s intuition, it’s foul play.” This is weird. It’s another red flag. Why the sudden change of tense? It’s as if she is repeating what she has heard someone else say before. It sure makes you wonder, doesn’t it?
When most people face a crisis, normal behavior is for them to hold on to every shred of hope that the worst case scenario didn’t happen. They don’t want to believe that something horrible is wrong. Instead, they cling to “safe potentials” because it is comforting, but Christine does not. She doesn’t plea to her husband to come home, or worry that perhaps that something else happened. She just accepts foul play without question–which is unusual.
Look at her lack of emotions as well. Here she is telling us she thinks her husband was potentially harmed, or coerced into leaving, and yet she doesn’t seem to show any concern whatsoever when she first talks about it. Then in the middle of it, she expresses some emotion, but it dissipates quickly.
Greta then asks if there were any peculiar phone calls to the house to which Christine replies as calm and collected as one can be “No, not at all.”
Christine’s emotions almost turn on and off like a faucet, don’t they?
And last, on one of Christine Francisco’s profiles at JPG Magazine, Christine Francisco is listing herself as single!
You read that right. Single.
It’s not even four months since this happened, and she is content listing herself as single? I can’t imagine the courts have declared her husband dead without a body. What is Christine thinking?
If that doesn’t turn your head, I don’t know what will. It’s like she is resigned to the fact he is gone forever. Hmmm….
I’m wondering what Christine knows that we don’t.
* Thanks to Cheri’s Corner forum for sharing the many video links.
Set Up Your Recorders!
/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for LiesThis Saturday night, 48 Hours will be running a new program titled “The Preacher’s Wife“. It’s about Kari and Matt Baker, who I have written about in the past. ABC’s 20/20 did a small segment on the story in March.
If things go well for me this weekend, I will try to write this up by early next week and share with you anything that I might see.
Set your DVR to record Saturday, May 10, at 10 p.m. ET/PT.