Duper’s Delight

I ran across a story this weekend of suspect, Juan Aguilar, who is accused of harassing a 12 year-old girl in El Paso, Texas. Click on the video link on the left side of this page to watch the suspect talk.

The suspect denies the accusations that he did anything, but I don’t believe him. The situation doesn’t bode well for him from the circumstances and his past history — but that is not what caught my eye. Innocent people are accused all the time so I don’t let that impact my opinion.

What caught my eye, however, is that this man repeatedly flashes what is known as duper’s delight. He keeps radiating a type of joy or pleasure as he speaks over and over again! His eyes flash it, his mouth shows it — it’s undeniable.

If you are accused of something you DID NOT DO and you could face time behind bars — I would expect to see emotions that are consistent with that: anger, frustration, fear, etc. but I don’t see any of that. I see flits of joy, or glee which is a HUGE, HUGE red flag.

Do you see the duper’s delight? You don’t have to watch more than a minute or two of the video to see it.

People who are the worst…

…at spotting deception, if you want my opinion, don’t question things.

They don’t question things.

While they may ask questions — they don’t dig for answers, or play the “what if” game. Or, if they do– they don’t do it with an open mind. These people are not researchers or fact finders. The majority of them don’t question authority. To them, people in authority are usually “experts” and “good people” who shouldn’t be questioned. After all, they hold a high-ranking status in society which should be respected — not doubted. I’ve come to describe these people as literalists.

Literalists are the people in our society who are the worst at spotting deception, and I guestimate they are somewhere around 15 -20% of people I meet.

The definition of a literalist from the dictionary is: “one who adheres to the letter or exact word; an interpreter according to the letter.” Most people when they hear the term literalist usually think of people who take the book of their religion and choose to believe in it word-for-word — like strict fundamentalists.

When I say literalist, I am using the term slightly differently. I am talking about people who take everything and everyone they met or get to know at face value — but my definition is void of religious implications.

Literalists, to me, don’t see the world in shades of gray. They only see black and white.

If you were to say to a literalist that their best friend was just seen stealing fifty dollars, while they might listen you out, they wouldn’t question the details of what happened. Instead, they’d automatically defend their friend, and tell you all the ways you must have misinterpreted the situation. They’d be certain someone misunderstood something. Literalists don’t stop to say with a truly open mind, “You know, that isn’t the person I know — but what happened? Why do you say that?” They don’t investigate the situation , or truly listen to what someone is saying without bias.

Literalists, however, are usually good people. They truly want to believe the best in everyone. They are often kind and giving and fiercely loyal people — probably to a flaw. They usually make good friends too.

If you continued to insist to a literalist that their best friend stole this money, and you are going to take action against their friend, a literalist would likely get annoyed with you. They would think quietly to themselves that you are the one with a problem — that you are a pessimist for thinking the way you do.

Literalists automatically assume if someone is nice — they are inherently good. Even in the face of people saying otherwise, literalists will continue to believe a good person is good until the evidence against that belief is clearly visible to their own eyes, or it is so overwhelming (i.e. they are the last to hold that believe), it is undeniable.

If someone has done something bad that they have witnessed with their own two eyes (like stealing) — a literalist will not trust that person again, and he or she will be known as inherently bad. They will still be nice, and kind to these “bad” people — but under the cover of their thoughts will be feelings of distrust, and perhaps feelings of “fear” that is not likely to ever go away completely — even after the passage of time — and renewed efforts to restore the distrust.

Literalists don’t understand human nature nor are they able to read emotions in people. Hence, they take the world at face value. When you and I see color, they only see black and white. They don’t see gray. They are, in essence, color-blind.

The reason I write this post is get people to ponder things more — to question things around them. I am not suggesting that you distrust anyone and everything you hear. Give people the benefit of the doubt, always– but do look at things and ask questions. If someone tells you someone is really nice — it’s okay to wonder why. Why are they nice? If someone tells you someone is really bad — don’t just accept it. Question why. You might find a brilliant, exceptional person underneath the exterior who has been greatly misunderstood.

The dumb question, as the saying goes, is the one that was never asked. As I see it, you have absolutely nothing to lose by questioning things. In fact, you might actually discover a new truth!

As I see it, people who are good at spotting deception find evidence to either support or reject their belief system. They are always looking for things to substantiate what they believe. They are naturally curious and inquisitive. They also don’t take things at face value. They question things all the time, and are open to a new belief if the evidence points them in a different direction.

Anyone, with any ability to detect lies, can improve their abilities by wondering why and asking questions — with a truly open mind to discover whatever may come their way.

The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955)
Truth fears no questions.
Anonymous

Nealy 100,000 page loads

If you are the 100,000 visitor — say hi!

Q & A

In private e-mails, I get asked a fair amount of questions. So with that, I’ve started a Q & A forum on my website.

You can check it out here:

If I missed any – don’t be shy to speak up.

Good News for my Dad

For those of you who are regulars on my blog, a few weeks back I posted about my dad visiting an optometrist to get his eye glass prescription updated. That optometrist scared my parents, and worse, I believe this optometrist was deceptive. You can read about it here.

With that, on March 1st, my dad went to see his glaucoma specialist. My dad’s eye pressure was elevated, but it wasn’t as elevated as that optometrist said it was. I’d prefer to believe it was different calibration of equipment. But, nonetheless, it was elevated and my dad needed to address it. His glaucoma specialist told him that they had one more medication to try and if that failed, surgery would be the last option. They had tried the handful of medications that he felt were safe and effective.

Today was my dad’s appointment. We were all a little nervous. Would the medication work — or would he face surgery?

We got good news!! This last medication worked and brought my dad’s eye pressure down to a very good and healthy level. Yay! He is free to go about life again without worry now until August — and then at six month intervals if all continues to go well.

That other optometrist I wondered about? I’m more convinced then ever he was out to line his own pockets — not to care for my dad. My dad got his eye pressure down safely without the urgently needed surgery or cataract removal, thank you very much 🙂

There are days when having eyes for lies is painful — watching and seeing the pain in people’s eyes. But today — it was absolutely splendid to know that my eyes (and my wizard mom’s eyes) helped my dad’s eyes and kept him safe from unnecessary harm.