Joran van der Sloot: on Primetime Live Tonight!

I just got this tip from a viewer — thank you, B!

Tonight ABC new’s Primetime Live will air an interview with Joran van der Sloot at 10:00 p.m. ET. Joran van der Sloot is the Dutch teen who was held as a suspect in the Natalee Holloway case in Aruba. If you follow the link now, they show you the text of the interview. I already see one red flag in the text that raises questions and an eyebrow that things may not be what they seem… of course it doesn’t mean Joran van der Sloot in lying. It just means I have questions.

Tune in with me, and if you want, record the show. If I see anything unusual, I will share it with you and then you can go back and check it out for yourself.

And don’t forget to check back tomorrow to see what I believe!

Confess to a murder you didn’t commit?

Brief Case Summary Here at Wikipedia

CBS News show 48 Hours profiled a case on Saturday night about a Halloween night murder in Columbia, Missouri, a few years back. A newspaper editor, Kent Heitholt, was found bludgeoned to death beside his car in the parking lot at 2:00 in the morning — and police couldn’t solve the case.

For two years.

Then, a local young man started talking to his friends and telling them he was dreaming about the murders. The young man finally went to the police and told them.

You have to watch the video of the young man, Chuck Erickson, talking to police. Go to this page, and then on the right-hand side of the screen, you will see Chuck on a video screen . Watch the video footage. Chuck is being lead by police.

For some strange reason, this young man either convinced himself he was the murderer from his dreams, or was lead by police and then convinced by their actions he was the murderer. Perhaps this young man is mentally ill and twisted and wanted to see how far he could take things by trying to get his friend convicted and sentence to prison. I have no idea what the motivating factor is to admit to a crime he didn’t commit, but I can tell you I don’t believe Chuck killed anyone.

I have little doubt that Chuck Erickson has a troubled past. More than that, I think Chuck Erickson is likely to be pathological. He is a classic “neutral person” who doesn’t express one OUNCE of emotion. He is like a drone. Void and empty. With that, I can tell you what wouldn’t motivate a young man like Chuck to go to the police and confess: a guilty conscience. Chuck didn’t and still doesn’t have any emotions — let alone a guilty conscious. When Chuck talks and points out Ryan Ferguson in court, he is saying what he thinks he should say without any conviction in his face or voice.

I do not believe that Chuck Erickson murdered anyone. Nor do I believe his friend, Ryan Ferguson is guilty, either. (FYI: Ryan was sentence to 40 years in prison. An innocent man is sitting in jail).

When I see Ryan Ferguson talk, I truly believe what he has to say. In the first thirty second clip of Ryan on the show, when he said he was glad his parents believed him, Ryan flashed a an expression which showed genuine relief — which was congruent to what he was saying. It was at this point, I knew Ryan was innocent. And the more Ryan talked, the more he convinced me. His emotions matched his words and his actions. It was all congruent.

Here are other reasons why I don’t believe either committed the murders:

  1. The crime scene was bloody. Blood spatter was everywhere — yet no one saw these unprofessional high-school-aged killers with bloody clothes, or found bloody clothes disposed of.
  2. Nor did the police ever find the murder weapon.
  3. Don’t tell me youth like these can commit the perfect murder without a conscious plan to commit murder. I don’t buy it. I personally suspect this was a politically motivated murder executed by a hitman. It was too perfect.
  4. How come the police were never able to link the two boys to the crime with DNA? The police had DNA — a hair in the victim’s hand.
  5. While there was a janitor in the building who thought he saw two boys in the parking lot, he wasn’t able to give any description of them for years! He only remembered when the police told him what he was supposed to remember. Furthermore, this janitor has a shaky past (as he was in prison).
  6. Chuck Erickson comes across as a man who feels no emotion, has no emotion or feelings for any other person. He is emotionally void. When he spoke in court, I did not get one hint of support that he was telling the truth. Everything he said however points to a lie.
  7. The evidence against Chuck that he is a liar is mounting. Chuck’s story about the murder involves the two boys who were at the time of murder in high school going back to a bar after the crime. If this is accurate, the boys would have returned to the bar after 2:00 a.m. The bar closed at 1:30 a.m. Chuck’s story is a lie.
  8. Ryan Ferguson emotions, and facial expressions were all consistent with what he was saying. I have no doubt this boy is honest in the face of all of these facts.

Michael Brown: The Fall-out Guy?

I had an interesting experience this week. A reader e-mailed me and asked me for an opinion about Fema Director Michael Brown who was in charge during Katrina. He provided me with the following links and wanted to know if I thought Brown was honest or not.

Clip 1
Clip 2

Like all people, I will confess to my share of judgements and when it came to Brown, my judgement wasn’t good. Because this adminstration has frustrated me so much, I just turn away these days. I don’t watch, listen or read anymore because it is the same old story and I am worn thin. I found the name of the site where the links were posted, interesting too.

However, I was shocked after watching the first clip of Brown. I was amazed. When I watched Brown, I trusted what he was saying to be true. His anger was genuine, his emotions were true. I watched the second clip and my opinion didn’t change.

All of the sudden, I was like wow. I wonder if Michael Brown is the fall out guy for this administration’s handling of Katrina. I can’t help but wonder…

Don’t get me wrong, I think Michael Brown knows more than he is saying…but nonetheless it appears he is being truthful. It appears that he did what he is saying he did — and those above him who were to carry orders out — had other orders from other people to “not do them”.

Very interesting. Very interesting.

Life & Mind of a Hitman

Sunday night on A&E, I watched the Iceman Tapes: The Conversations with a Killer.

It was chilling.

Haunting.

Creepy enough to give you nightmares, to make you double-check your locks, to pull all your blinds, and to make you want to fear every man you’ve ever known!!

On the show, notorious mob hit man, Richard Kuklinski shares snippets of his mind with the audience. He answers frank questions calculatedly yet amazingly honest at times. Regardless, Kuklinski is a difficult person to read. Why? Because he is clearly a psychopath. He admits he had no guilt for all the horrific crimes he committed. He said he never thought about them nor was he ever haunted by them.

Richard Kuklinski was known to aerosolize cyanide, using a spray to kill his victims in less than a minute. He also told a story where he walked into a bar, acted drunk, spilled his drink on a guy — a drink laced with cyanide — walked away — and later heard he claimed another victim.

Kuklinski earned the title Ice Man because he froze one of his victims for two years and when he disposed of the victim, he didn’t take into account his victim needed to thaw before discovery to successfully pull off the crime. The medical examiner realized upon review that they body was still frozen — and that there was more to this murder than what met the eye.

It doesn’t take much to say that this man was deeply, deeply disturbed. He disturbed ME!

I had a realization during this show last night. I realized that psychopathic liars do feel emotions – – even though most of the time, they are neutral. I realized they only feel their own pain — and not the pain of others. When I see this, it hints at a bigger picture. It hints for me to look closer.

Psychopaths, who are capable of serious crimes, do not feel emotions for other people. While I knew that, I never connected consciously that the only emotions they feel are their own.

Murderers like Kuklinski, BTK, Scott Peterson, etc. see other people as objects and not human beings. They will treat you right — usually better than average (if you are a stranger or a friend, not the target of their obsession. They will pull out all the stops to make you believe in them, but behind their facade, you will not see any deep or true emotion.

Some psychopaths can fake emotions quite well–good enough to really make me second-guess myself. If that is the case, the only other way to uncover a psychopath like these guys is to look for inconsistencies in fact to back up your suspicions. That will be the biggest clue that something is amiss. When 1 + 1 = 4 time-and-time again — something is up. That can make for a tough investigation, though.

There are people who are safe around these crazy psychopaths. If the psychopath has deemed you IMPORTANT and SPECIAL, in the power of their world, and they don’t believe you are any threat to them emotionally or physically in any way — you will be safe. You will be lied to repeatedly, but you will be safe and unharmed. Case-in-point: The wives and children of both Kuklinksi and BTK. Both men, in a sick way, loved their family and never once imagined hurting any one of them.

The big question is just how do you know you are deemed important to a psychopath?? Of course, you can’t so you can never ever trust them! Laci Peterson and her son were a threat to Scott Peterson. Scott Peterson lost control with Laci I believe due to the expectant baby and felt his lifestyle was threatened and in the end treated her like an object and killed her.

The world of psychopaths is complex, bizarre and out right strange — if not utterly creepy.

Adam Saleh and Julie Popovich

SALEH TALKS
Click to watch the story

A reader asked me for an opinion on this story. I am not familiar with it. However, I did watch the video of the suspect talking (see link above). Here is my opinion:

Adam Saleh says the right things, does the right things (outside of talking TOO MUCH) yet oddly his expressions are NOT in alignment with his actions.

Throughout this interview, he keeps smiling, smirking and flashing expressions of glee.

With that, I have to ask myself WHY is this guy happy? He appears genuinely happy, as if he were having tea with friends talking about a joyful event in his life — not the murder of a missing woman where **he has been named a suspect!**

Other times, he tries to act like he cares about the murdered woman (talking about her funeral after saying he didn’t know her) or people in general — yet he doesn’t show a flicker of TRUE emotion to back it up. He is a classic “neutral” person.

If someone is innocent and the finger is being pointed at them — they get worried, afraid, and stressed. Adam was only stressed at the beginning of the interview when the cameraman set up. After he got rolling, all his stress dissipated.

**Why isn’t Adam worried, afraid or stressed?**

That is the big question and a biggest tip-off that something isn’t right here. It’s the biggest red flag!

Adam also says he is shy yet in the video he is very outgoing –possessing all the social skills to be convincing. I think Adam is “selective” in his socializing, but he is NOT SHY though he wants YOU to believe he is shy.

Adam strikes me as someone who believes he is super intelligent and that may in fact be part of his downfall. Does he believe he could commit the perfect murder? He is very calculating at what he says and how he says it — almost so he doesn’t have to tell a lie when answering certain questions. He avoids lying by saying it just the “right way”.

There are other things that add up to a bigger picture as well. While each of these things I’ve listed below are NOT indicators alone — when combined with his inconsistent attitude above and the group of clues below — my eyebrows are seriously raised:

1. Adam talks on and on – as if trying to convince his audience. It’s like he believes he can convince anyone.
2. He stutters,
3. he word-searches,
4. and speaks in odd sentence structures.
5. He also salivates a few times and swallows oddly

Do I trust this guy? My answer is no. I’d be afraid to be with him alone because he is “charming” yet without emotion.

Who would be happy standing in his shoes when they are innocent? Anyone??

Is he enjoying all this attention or what?