I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I don’t believe Tom Brady.
In the interview above, his behavior is truly supportive of someone who is less than honest, and here is why.
The interviewer asks, “Has this detracted from your joy of winning the super bowl?”
Tom replies as he soaks up the attention from his fans, “Absolutely not.”
Tom continues about the report, “I don’t really have any reaction. It’s only been 30 hours, I haven’t had much time to digest it fully but when I do, I’ll be sure to let you know how I feel about it.”
Only 30 hours? Come on…
It’s not a new accusation, Tom. It’s been around for four months and you have no reaction?
Could it be there is nothing you can say to get you out of this so denial is your best option?
Imagine being accused of something you did NOT do–publicly–that if true tarnishes your hard earn accomplishments. Are you just going to ignore it?
You will not. I assure you.
Honest people will be offended by anyone who attacks their hard earned credibility, and at a minimum will clearly and emphatically deny involvement. But not Tom. No, he just sits there and soaks up the attention–ignoring everything. And it makes sense. If he is guilty, pushing it away for as long as he can to soak up his stardom seems like the only good choice. Deny, deny and deny until you have no other option.
When the moderator says there is an elephant in the room, listen to Tom deny it again. It’s a joke.
Honest people don’t ignore things like this. They address it even if in the simplest of terms.
Tom eerily reminds me of Bill Cosby and his thinking: If I ignore it, it will go away. And sometimes it does.
The fact that Tom won’t share his phone, text messages or emails also supports Tom has something to hide.
Tom is arrogant and as I always say nothing good comes from arrogant people.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2015-05-08 15:33:262015-05-08 15:36:39Tom Brady’s Behavior Not Square with Honesty
Tom Brady and the head coach, Bill Belichick, of the Patriots leaks too many clues for me to believe them back in January of this year when they “played” ignorant to any knowledge or involvement. I discussed this on my Facebook page and here on the blog.
It’s nice to see the investigation is getting to the facts now.
The truth prevails more often than not…
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2015-05-06 20:12:402015-05-06 20:16:18Deflate Gate: Involvement “More Probable Than Not”
Here is an interesting interview for you. What do you see?
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2015-05-01 12:52:402015-05-01 12:52:40“Her Own Words Did Her In”
When I watched Anita Smithey on 48 Hours, I do not believe that she said onehonestthingin the entire interview. It was jaw dropping and the clues were abundant from the very first minute we see her to the very end of the interview. I could write a book on her.
Anita tries to portray a very different person then she truly is, but fails miserably at it.
When Anita hears the verdict, if she was truly a victim, I would expect surprise or shock, but we see none of it. Then you can literally see Anita work up a reaction–a very fake one. Listen to her give a fake wail as she attempts to “collapse” in her attorney’s arms. And look at how upset she is in this still shot below when she is wailing! That wail she creates is anything but real and genuine.
When I listen to the 911 call, there are immediate clues that she is acting in her voice. There are notable changes which can be immediately articulated.
I love how she shoots him, and then has no fear and goes outside and says on the 911 call as she sits outside on the steps, “I don’t want him to die.”
Wait a minute here!! I thought you were afraid for your life–that he was going to kill you–but you turned your back and went outside and sat down? And had no fear??
Would you turn your back on someone without knowing if they are 100% dead if you feared for your life?
How is that anywhere consistent with her story?
It’s flat out absurd.
Anita said on 48 Hours, “Did I think he could kill me, yes I did.”
If you are truly afraid, you don’t turn your back on the man even if you think he is dead, because if he is a dangerous, he could just pull through and surprise you, and kill you! Fear doesn’t dissipate that quickly in a life or death situation.
I love how Anita says “he had violent sex with me” instead of rape. You notice she can’t use the word “rape”? It’s notable.
According to one of Anita’s friends during the trial, Anita shared with her that she and Robert willfully engaged in “rough sex” by choice and there was knives involved and she enjoyed it. It was her “thing”.
Hmmm…
When Anita recounts Robert coming after her, she shows no supportive emotions whatsoever. You’d think she was talking about a lunch party instead. There is no fear, stress, concern, or tension in her face at all. It’s eerily missing.
Anita’s injuries are completely superficial, and worse she admits she made them herself. There was no intense pressure from police in the interview we see. She could have left at any time, but she chose to keep talking by choice–to convince police of what she was saying.
After the murder, Anita called her best friend and said, “I’m sorry, I didn’t want it to go this way. He was hurting me.”
I would expect Anita to say that she feared for her life, that he was raping her and was going to kill her, but she doesn’t. She can’t quite say it because I believe its untrue.
Anita says when talking about Robert showing up at her house the night she killed him, “I was a littleconcerned with what he is doing here. I don’t know where this is going.”
Anita wants you to think he surprised her, right? Yet we hear that he came by to have sex on Monday nights when her kids were at their father’s house. So it wasn’t unusual for them to spend time together.
Furthermore, a detective says, “Anita first said Mr. Cline came over to the house that night and somehow was able to get inside the house.”
Then she says after Robert came over, he fixed her cable. He just randomly shows up and decides to fix her cable? Are you buying it?
After he fixed the cable, they watched a movie and started kissing, “Okay, so he wants to have sex, and this is what we do and he’ll go home. So I’m sort ofconsensual on…you know, having sex with him….initially.”
Do you see how she is all over the board here?
After the sex, 48 Hours reports that Anita said she got dressed and she told Robert to leave, and she talks about how he put a knife to her neck. Notice she tells him to leave–that’s quite bold if she is an abused women under his control. Don’t you think?
Anita says, “‘I’m like….if you hurt me, you’re not going to get away with this. Everyone’s gonna know it’s you’ …Because I felt at that moment, is he threatening to kill me? Like what is he doing with the knife? I don’t understand like what he’s doing.”
Does that make sense?
If you just had sex with someone, and they violently attack you afterwards and come after you and put a knife at your neck, would you not know what was going on?
Her story is a absurd.
Then Anita says nothing more about the knife, her being cut (no details), just now Robert wanted “rough sex”.
No offense here, but when men age, they typically need time before they can engage again. And she no longer fights him? Suddenly he is reaching for coconut oil — that investigators found in the bathroom, not where Anita said it was.
Yeah, right.
So Anita says, “I’ve gotta gun (which she says put under her pillow when he got the coconut oil) get off of me.”
And she wants us to believe big bad Robert Cline who is so much bigger than her, and raping her, and who is sitting on top of her docilely stops, watches her wiggle around, finds her gun and shoot him.
In the back.
How did he even get on his stomach when he was raping her?
So much of this story is missing. For a reason.
Suddenly she is stronger and more powerful then him. Wow!
Then she says, “We were so close, like he was right there. We were so close. To the point that I think he was almost leaning on the gun.”
With his back?
This is crazy. Big bad Robert just leaned on her gun. He had no fear of a gun and let her wield it at him.
Right.
Her entire account is riddled with lies, false accounts and nonsense. I personally believe she intentionally killed Robert. She was sick of him, his arguments with her, and wanted finally to show him who was really in control and it wasn’t Robert.
I suspect Anita and Robert had tense relationship. They argued and were like oil and water at times. I don’t disagree about that. There was verbal arguments, and maybe some heated situations, but I don’t believe a word Anita tells us this incident at all.
I could write a book about this woman. Thank goodness she is locked up!
There is actually one huge whopper in this case that I haven’t addressed. Do you know what it is?
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2015-04-29 13:28:592015-04-29 13:51:13Anita Smithey “The Verdict” 48 Hours
Was it a mystery for you, or did you see the truth clearly?
For me, this was a very black and white case.
Vote below and I’ll share my thoughts in the coming days!
[polldaddy poll=8829069]
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2015-04-27 14:12:262015-04-27 14:12:26Self-defense or Cold Blooded Killer (48 Hours)?