Renee Ellory |  Eyes for Lies
  • Home
  • About
    • Articles
    • Media Appearances
    • Myths to Deception Detection
  • Services
    • Deception Detection & Credibility Training
    • Facial Profiling
      • The Science of Facial Profiling
    • Who has Renee trained?
  • Testimonials
    • Video Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Instagram

Tag Archive for: Nathan Gann

48 Hours Tonight

June 19, 2010/in 48 Hours/by Eyes for Lies


Watch CBS News Videos Online
48 Hours Preview (video): Daddy’s Girl

Here is tonight’s 48 Hours story. I wrote my thoughts on this case when it originally aired in May of last year. You can read them here. Click on the labels below to see all of my thoughts on this case.

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2010-06-19 22:07:002010-06-19 22:07:0048 Hours Tonight

Nathan Gann and Brae Hansen

May 22, 2009/in 48 Hours, murder/by Eyes for Lies

Both Nathan Gann and Brae Hansen give me pause when they tell their stories, even after they admit to involvement. Many of you commented on what you saw as deceptions in Brae’s 911 call, and you did a great job! You didn’t leave much left for me to say, but here are a few of my thoughts.

Read morePlease realize we know this 911 call is deceptive, so I am looking at it as if we didn’t know the truth, to show you all the hot spots to deception:

  1. Brae says, “I think we’ve been robbed and my Dad’s been shot.” What is fascinating about this is that there is no urgency on Brae’s part to save her dad. Did you notice? The order of things often points to the importance of things. If Brae wanted her dad to live, she would have begged the 911 operator for help for her dad before discussing anything else. She would have also likely gone to his side and tried to help him, but instead we have to wait for the operator to ask Brae if her dad needs paramedics. It’s haunting and then she doesn’t say yes, she says “I think he is dead” without confirming that this is true. It’s chilling. Did she already know he was dead because they checked his pulse?
  2. When the 911 operator asked Brae what did the intruder say, Brae says, “He asked for the combination to the safe.” You would think she would have recollected more details here, point of references of where she was when she noticed the intruder, specific words he said, etc. The lack of detail is an immediate red flag.
  3. Again when 911 operator asks Brae “What did your dad do?” Brae says, “He just refused and then he shot him.” The word “just” stands out to me here. It’s a minimizer. It doesn’t fit the scenario. Also, Brae doesn’t give us any conversations or details. Again, it’s a red flag.
  4. When the 911 operator asks Brae, “Where is your dad right now?” listen to Brae’s response. The tone of her voice indicates frustration–almost annoyance. Isn’t frustration/annoyance an odd emotion to be feeling when her dad is lying on the floor in a pool of blood dead or dying? It’s like she is annoyed by all the questions from the 911 operator. Isn’t that odd?
  5. When the 911 operator asks Brae about the intruder and says, “So he didn’t take anything?” Brae first responds, “I don’t know.” Isn’t that interesting considering she first said they were robbed? It’s a big inconsistency. After a pause, she says, “He took my watch and my ring.” Would that make any sense for an intruder? If he ties them both up, wouldn’t he want more expensive items that just Brae’s watch? Why wouldn’t the intruder bug her for the safe combination? Ask her for jewelry? Steal her dad’s wallet? Her purse? It raises more red flags.
  6. Was Brae tied up to anything? If not, what intruder would just tie someone’s hands behind their back yet leave them free to wander?
  7. When the 911 operator asks Brae if she can tell if her dad is breathing, listen to the amount of time it takes before Brae answers. Clearly, Brae has no urgency whatsoever to get help. It’s chilling. It’s like she is thinking before she speaks and doesn’t know what to say. Then she finally pipes up and says, “I’m too far away to check.” If Brae wasn’t tied down to anything, this is an absolutely cold and callous response–a response of someone who doesn’t give a damn about the person lying on the floor. That’s for sure. If she was tied up, I would expect her to say, “I can’t get to him…please get here quickly” but she doesn’t do that either. Nothing Brae does shows compassion for her dead or dying step-father.

Returning back to Nathan, when he spoke in his police interrogation, his body language was less than supportive of his story. Furthermore, when I listened to the account of “convicted drug dealer” who testified against Nathan, I believe him for the most part. First, he talks about facts that pan out. Second, his account matches what the police know. He also knew that Nathan bought clothing at the Goodwill for which they have a receipt. This is very damning and worse, Nathan’s answer doesn’t hit me as sincere. Nathan says,”…But I don’t tell him anything. I never – this man is not all there. There’s no reason why I would trust or confide in this guy.”

If Nathan just wanted to shake up his step-father and scare him, then there would be absolutely no reason for him to have bought black clothes at the Goodwill, would there?

These two people were in cohoots to kill their step-father. There is no doubt about it. Brae may have had doubts during the killing, but in the end, she didn’t seem to show any regrets or desire to help her father immediately thereafter, did she? It’s very chilling.

* Please rate stories below. It helps me know what is most interesting to you, my readers!

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2009-05-22 14:38:002009-05-22 14:38:00Nathan Gann and Brae Hansen

Brae Hansen’s 911 Call

May 21, 2009/in Uncategorized/by Eyes for Lies

We know Brae Hansen’s 911 call is deceptive from the 48 Hours show, Daddy’s Girl. What clues to you see that she is being deceptive?

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2009-05-21 12:14:002009-05-21 12:14:00Brae Hansen’s 911 Call

Nathan Gann’s Interrogation

May 20, 2009/in 48 Hours/by Eyes for Lies

Watch Nathan Gann’s Interrogation here

* I haven’t watched the show yet, but this was really chilling!

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2009-05-20 10:53:002009-05-20 10:53:00Nathan Gann’s Interrogation

“Daddy’s Girl” on 48 Hours Tonight

May 16, 2009/in 48 Hours/by Eyes for Lies

Tonight’s episode of 48 Hours looks like a good mystery. From 48 Hours:

“DID A BROTHER AND SISTER CONSPIRE TO MURDER THEIR STEPFATHER? [ITS] A CASE OF HE SAID SHE SAID”

See a preview here, or read about the show here.

Don’t forget to set your DVRs!

https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg 0 0 Eyes for Lies https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg Eyes for Lies2009-05-16 11:12:002009-05-16 11:12:00“Daddy’s Girl” on 48 Hours Tonight

NEW ONLINE TRAINING COMING SOON!
Get Notified of Future Courses

Renee Ellory has written this blog since 2006, dedicating her free time to help others understand people. By sharing her insights on human behavior, deception and the truth.

Many people have shared with Renee their personal stories of how her insight has greatly affected their lives. It definitely motivates Renee to continue to dedicate her time when she is available.

Renee tracked her accuracy publicly for 7.5 years, and was 95% accurate, whereas the average person is 54% accurate. She didn’t miss a case for five years sharing her thoughts before the truth was known! She is a scientifically tested and studied expert.

While she doesn’t track her cases anymore due to limited time, she still shares her opinions with the public when time allows.

Search

Search Search

Archives

Suggest a Topic

Recent Posts

  • Stress is the Great Unmasker. Use It. December 9, 2025
  • Do Liars Really Touch Their Nose More? Here’s the Truth. December 4, 2025
  • ChatGPT Told Me a Liar Was Telling the Truth—Here’s What It Missed.  December 1, 2025
  • ChatGPT Called a Liar “Honest” – Renee Reacts on Substack November 30, 2025
  • Pressure Testing an LLM: Hallucinations, Tone Drift, and the Cost of Lying Nicely April 16, 2025
Please note because this is blog is over a decade old some information has been lost in the multiple transitions between platforms. When you see a missing post or a post without comments, it was likely lost during a migration. Our sincerest apologies.

Thank you for visitiing!

Eyes for Lies | Renee Ellory

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top