Study: Psychopaths DO Feel Fear

Republica / Pixabay

Republica / Pixabay

New research out of the Netherlands has reviewed the widely held beliefs that psychopaths don’t feel fear and think the belief came about erroneously.  They actually do believe psychopaths feel fear, but they just react to it differently than you and I do.  And that makes sense to me.

I have never believed psychopaths don’t feel emotions, or “act” because they are void.  They absolutely feel all the emotions we do, but they simply feel it for themselves. They just lack empathy for others.

I can find many psychopaths displaying the seven universal emotions and they aren’t acting them out. They are truly feeling them.

Does this change how you think about psychopaths?

Check out an article on this here.

17 replies
  1. Shy
    Shy says:

    If I was to guess, I believe that what they are actually missing is the ability to trust and connection to other human beings. I’m sure that would have a profound affect on their ability to experience love. I’d be curious to hear others’ thoughts.

  2. Russ Conte
    Russ Conte says:

    Thanks for the post. My experience also shows that psychopaths feel all seven emotions for themselves, but there is a huge disconnect with other people. No empathy, support, caring, the other person is simply an object for the psychopath to use. The psychopath might even be able to identify if another person feels (for example) fear, but it won’t have any impact on them because of no empathy.

    As Shy writes, psychopaths have no trust (except of themselves), and any emotional connection with them is impossible. Healthy love, of course, is totally out of the question.

  3. Alex
    Alex says:

    I wonder if psychopaths can get infatuated. Is compassion necessary for that kind of love to exist? Also, some people with “harsh” personalities can have strong moral values. On the other hand, warm, sympathetic people can sometimes do morally reprehensible stuff. I wonder whenever psychopaths are more lacking in the former department, the latter or both.

  4. Tracker
    Tracker says:

    I recently watched a couple videos on an atheist turned Christian, who is also a psychopath. I looked up the clinical definition just to be sure and that is an accurate description. I don’t think he is lying for faking, but it makes no sense that a psychopath would turn to Christ. Is there different levels? Could it have been a phase? In other videos he makes the best logical case for god that I’ve seen (speaking as an agnostic), could he have logically concluded that there is a god and developed a kind of intellectual empathy? He said if one of his kids died he would want to ball his eyes out but don’t think he could. So weird.

    In the second video he talks about Vincent Van Gogh and offers another take on that famous ear story. What’s interesting is how he speaks of Van Gogh who is on the opposite scale of him, someone who feels too much empathy for people and that’s why many consider him insane.

    He has me questioning what I thought I knew about psychopaths.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS8aUSygJM0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5yjhVX8sic

      • Tracker
        Tracker says:

        That second video is from his YouTube channel, and he has videos going back 5 years. I’ve seen a lot of his videos and maybe an interview before I came across the first video. Even though that first video does disturb me a bit (well, maybe more than a bit – he is saying he’s a psychopath who tried to kill his dad) I am convinced he’s trying to do good. Most psychopaths I imagine follow rules and laws because they don’t want the consequences, and they treat others well not because they care about them but because life is difficult if they think you’re an a-hole. This guy I think is trying to do god’s work despite feeling no empathy towards others. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything quite like it.

        • RideAWildHorse
          RideAWildHorse says:

          OMG. Thanks so much for posting these two videos. I’ve watched some of this man’s other videos about the Koran (Qoran? how do you spell that?) and another video, not the one you posted here, about his conversion to Christianity.

          As I watched it I wondered if he was a psychopath because of the dispassionate WAY he spoke about his past. He did not mention that he was a psychopath in that particular video. But I distinctly remembering wondering if he was. I think Renee is really starting to rub off on me. ; – )

          • Tracker
            Tracker says:

            I just watched his video called “Why I Am a Christian (David Wood, Former Atheist)”, not sure if it the same one you saw. He does state that he can’t develop emotional attachments or feel empathy the way a normal person does.

            But wow was that an amazing video. It’s start with him going down in a subway tunnel talking about his life as a child then the story getting darker the further down he goes. Then when he gets to the subway level he talks about his time in prison. You know in movies where a character breaks the 4th wall and starts talking to the audience and the other characters pretend that he’s not doing any weird? That’s exactly how the NY subway riders act when there is a guy talking to a camera quite load and clear right in front of them. Then he starts talking about his conversion as he walks out of the tunnel at his destination.

            It felt like a produced video, but it was all in one 34 minute take! I’m sure he kind of mapped out what he wanted to say and when, but he wasn’t reading any notes.

            As impressive as the video was and as great of a storyteller he is I couldn’t help feeling after watching that maybe he’s not quite all there.

          • RideAWildHorse
            RideAWildHorse says:

            Yes, Tracker, that’s the one. The one in the subway. I agree with your comment, “I couldn’t help feeling after watching that maybe he’s not quite all there.” I think his psychopathy came through clearly on that video. But there’s something compelling about him also.

  5. Kage
    Kage says:

    I never really associated psychopathy with a lack of fear so much as with a lack of empathy and/or compassion. I can definitely see how those two things might be interrelated, or even how a lack of empathy and/or compassion may be misconstrued as a lack of fear in certain situations, but this doesn’t surprise me all that much.

    One of the people I hung out with in high school was almost certainly a sociopath. Having always been extremely curious about people (and feeling like I notice a lot more than most in social situations) I started asking him directly about it and it was fascinating. He definitely felt all emotions but I remember one thing he said to me that stood out is that he didn’t have to feel bad about hurting people if he didn’t want to. Whether he felt the empathy and could consciously remove it, or that he simply knew it was a situation for empathy is anybody’s guess at this point.

    Another thing I found interesting was how insanely intelligent and good he was with people, but at the same time how incredibly off-base his analyses of situations and people could sometimes be. Can’t think of specific examples as it was years ago, but the best way I can describe it is that it sometimes seemed like he was missing certain aspects of connecting with people and, as such, would completely misinterpret reactions/situations. Things like taking phrases literally and missing the emotional meaning behind people’s wordings, or misunderstanding peoples’ reactions to things, etc., etc.

      • Kage
        Kage says:

        Wish I could explain better, he was far from autistic (well socially, can’t say I know enough about the subject :P). He was very, very good with people and definitely mastered that superficial charm thats always talked about. It was just in some certain areas you could tell things were off. It was cool that he was so open about it, too. We both loved to analyze things and it made for some interesting conversations

        • Eyes for Lies
          Eyes for Lies says:

          The reason I wonder if psychopaths are typically smart, can often play people very well in social situations. They typically don’t misinterpret reactions/situations. They are masters at reading people typically. They also read other people’s emotions really well–way better than average person. That’s how come they are able to manipulate so many people. 🙂

          • Kage
            Kage says:

            He was extremely good at those things for sure. Master manipulator, feigned emotions ridiculously well, little/no empathy or compassion. What I wrote about has always given me pause for thought just because of how scary good he was at those things. I almost feel that since I was open to asking him about how he thinks and how his mind works that I got to see the patterns of thinking that were indicative of underlying problems. And ones you may not see in more superficial social settings.

            We had a really strange relationship… 😛

    • Keith D.
      Keith D. says:

      I have to agree with Eyes on that possibility. As someone who is autistic, or certainly on the spectrum, what you described rings true to me.

      I don’t personally like hurting people, and I work very hard to avoid doing it, but I’ve still done it several times in my life due to being mistaken about something, misunderstanding, or just being careless and selfish. And it was possible at least on some level to not feel bad about it if I didn’t want to. I don’t know if I can actually choose whether or not to feel bad about something like hurting someone, but I know that there are ways of compartmentalizing or rationalizing them that can counteract feeling bad or remorseful about them. It seems like they can at least be mitigated without too much trouble (at least with things where you’re not being malicious, because I can’t think of a time that I’ve actually been malicious toward someone to know for sure if the same things apply).

      When my dad was dying recently, I had a session with a psychologist because I wasn’t sure how I was going to handle it or whether I’d be able to cope with what was going on or what I was going to have to deal with and be partially responsible for (he was on hospice, and we had to care for him at home because we couldn’t afford anything else and there weren’t any other options available). In the hour I was talking with her, one of the common themes that kept going through my session was that with every issue or concern that I brought up to her, when she asked me about them, my responses to her kept being basically what she’d have gone over with a regular patient over several sessions, and she commented that I seemed to be very capable of working through problems on myself and that I had a surprising amount of insight into myself and how people work psychologically. She essentially was saying that I seemed to be able to conduct my own therapy with the issues I was facing, and that I just needed to follow through with the things I thought were good ways of dealing with them. She had very little to add other than to come back if I ever had difficulties or needed help with something, but that it didn’t seem as if I’d probably need to.

      The reason I bring that up is because I think that may be the core of why I feel like it might be possible to not feel bad about hurting someone. I suspect that because of the insight I have into myself and into human psychology, it may just be that I’m able to quickly work through feeling bad over something such that I don’t need to let it bother me much if I don’t want it to. In real life, there are limits on that however. It depends on my being in a really solid place and having enough psychological and emotional energy to take that on, because it’s actually pretty heavy to do it, and there are times where I’m faced with too many obstacles at once and I’m not able to do it, and if I’m not very careful with my self-management, I can easily get into a situation where I can’t get myself out and I become a bit paralyzed and have a really hard time actually functioning. I have to be able to have my space and my time and engage in my routines in order to build up the reserves necessary to cope with day to day life. I happen to be really good at that, so mostly nobody notices that I have to do it, but it’s definitely a lot more than most people are dealing with day to day, and that much is really obvious to me.

      There are times where my own analysis of people and situations can be really off too. It takes conscious, deliberate effort to get that right. I’m very good at it most of the time, but there’s nothing automatic or intrinsic about it— it’s many years of observation, introspection, and effort. I’ve been a people watcher since I was at least 3 years old. When my mom and sisters would go shopping on the way home from school as a kid, I’d crawl under the clothing racks in the department stores they were shopping in and just watch people and try to figure out who they were, what they were like, how they lived their lives, where they lived, what they did, that sort of thing. It’s how I entertained myself as a kid and basically through my whole life.

      As an example of how well I’ve done at that, I worked as a chauffeur for 5 years in Arizona, and even when I’d have a client that I had to drive to some event at the other end of the state, sometimes I’d run into another local chauffeur there who had a client at the same event, and we’d talk while we were waiting, and there were several times where as soon as they knew my name and the company I worked for, they already knew of my reputation. To this day, I still don’t know how or why that happened. I can’t think of any reason for it, I was just doing my job, but I did have tons of clients tell me that I was the best chauffeur they’d ever had. Even the president of one of the big German automakers told me that one night, and he said he wasn’t saying that as the president of the company, but as someone who was trained to do my job for Rolls Royce when he was young. So it’s obviously not my imagination that I can be great with people. Lots and lots of people have told me that. But again, none of that is automatic for me, it’s a result of lots of observation, introspection, and conscious effort.

      As far as missing certain aspects of connecting with people, when I had a girlfriend years ago, she thought I was amazing to the point that she pursued me rather vigorously for a couple of months, and kept having to be pretty explicit about her intentions, saying things like “why don’t you introduce me to people as your girlfriend?”, or “why don’t you ever call me? Why do I always have to call you? Aren’t you interested in me?” I didn’t introduce her to people as my girlfriend because I didn’t know we were boyfriend and girlfriend. I thought we were just friends doing things together. I didn’t call her because I didn’t want to disturb her or interrupt her and I never knew what she was doing, and I let her always call me because she was never interrupting me or disturbing me because I wanted to talk to her and spend time with her because I really liked her. I didn’t ever pursue her because I couldn’t tell if she was interested in me, so I assumed that like most people, she wasn’t, as that’s the safe bet. I don’t like making people uncomfortable or imposing on them, so dating just isn’t a thing I do. It’s not that I don’t want to, it’s that I can’t figure out how to. When she broke up with me months later, one of the things she said to me was that I was really great and she really fell in love with me, but she said that once she got close to me, it was as if at a certain point of getting close to me, it was like there was just nothing there.

      As good as I am at reading people and situations, with certain kinds of interactions, I’m like a blind person. I can’t find my way through them even with directions. The reality is that most social situations are made up of about 10% of all the various kinds of social interactions you can have with people. The majority of the possible social interactions you can have with someone make up a very small minority of all social situations. The 10% or so of common social situations are comprised of maybe 90% of possible social interactions, while the remaining 90% of social interactions only show up in about 10% of all social situations. Dating and romantic relationships fall into the 10% of all social situations category that are made up of the remaining 90% of social interactions. Think about it, the things you do and talk about with a romantic partner or spouse consist of tons of things that you don’t say or do with anyone else. Since those situations are so uncommon by comparison, I have little observational experience or insight into how those interactions take place, so I don’t know what I’m doing in those situations and I have a hard time figuring them out or interpreting them correctly. This is why it seemed to her that “nothing was there” once she got past a certain point of getting close to me. It’s not that nothing was there, it’s that I don’t know how to make the rest available, because I don’t understand those social situations or the interactions that make them up, and since I don’t like to upset, hurt, impose on, or make people uncomfortable, I take the safest route and do or say nothing instead. It’s not that there are no feelings or anything else there, it’s that I don’t know how to make another person a part of them, so I stop, which appears as “nothing there” or something else that’s “off” to the other person.

      I also tend to interpret things literally, and miss the emotional meaning behind what someone says or does. It takes conscious effort to spot that, and it uses up an enormous amount of psychological and emotional energy to do it, and sometimes something catches me off guard and I fail to do it. I’m pretty good at taking something that I take literally and determining from tone and context what it probably really means, but I do get those things wrong somewhat often. I also find a tremendous amount of humor in them at times, but I often can’t share that humor because other people don’t understand it or think it’s dumb, or they’d be offended by it for a variety of reasons. But it’s one of the core roots of my sense of humor, so that’s definitely there. It makes me really good at bad puns too, for that matter.

      I don’t know if these things strike a chord with you regarding your friend or not. I also don’t know if your friend was really autistic or not. Maybe they really were a sociopath/psychopath. But I do agree with Eyes that it’s possible that they were actually autistic. And what I can say about autistic people based on the several I’ve observed over the years is that they rarely have a lack of empathy. They usually have a high amount of it. It’s actually one of the things that causes them so many problems in life. They have all this empathy and they have all these feelings, but they don’t understand them or know what to do with them, which causes an extraordinary amount of anxiety and stress which gets dealt with by many of the observable traits of autism, like rocking, having to follow strict schedules or routines, placing things in very specific orders, excessive focus on numbers and patterns, spending a great deal of time off “in their own world”, displaying an apparent “hyperfocus” on specific topics (why you’ll hear a functional autistic kid talk on and on and on and on for hours about trains without any concern at all that you were done listening an hour ago etc.), and why they’re often bothered or disturbed by outside stimuli, like too much movement, too much sound, too many people, certain textures or shapes or numbers, etc. All of the traits and symptoms of autism tend to group together around just a couple of key things, and the things that you’re describing about your friend all fit with the kinds of things you might see with an autistic person.

      • Tracker
        Tracker says:

        You don’t even have to compartmentalizing or rationalizing to stop feeling empathy for someone. It can just happen naturally over time. For example someone who is always complaining about whatever. The first few times maybe you feel sorry, but after a while you don’t. Maybe compartmentalizing or rationalizing is the technical term, but I think a more accurate one is running out of effs to give. If someone is about to marry a bad person, run up $60K in student loans for a degree in design, or is about to buy a car they can’t afford and an inflated price out of concern them you can try really hard to talk them out of a disaster, but when they ignore you then exactly what you said would happen happens, they may be hurting but how bad can you feel for them? Giving no effs is a useful skill that can be developed. Sometimes it comes naturally. Not too long ago someone died a horrible painful death by accidentally self immolating. Normally I would feel bad for that person, but he only did that because he was trying to burn his wife to death in an honor killing. No sympathy for him.

        I’m sure if you did a little research you could have figured out her interests pretty quick. The key is to not analyze anything she says. Almost never does the actual words match up with how she’s feeling in any meaningful way. You look how she’s say things, her body language, what she’s paying attention to, things like that. In fact if it everything was equal instead of it being a friend of yours and you if you probably could have picked up on what’s going on in a few minutes if it was two random people.

  6. jmjoker
    jmjoker says:

    psychopaths feel all the emotions… but their pain and fear response/feeling is dull, very numb… since they don’t feel as much pain or fear as others… they feel less empathy for pain and fear in others

Comments are closed.