Dylan Redwine Story on Dr. Phil

Yesterday, Dr. Phil spent the last 15 minutes of his show talking with Elaine Redwine, mother of Dylan, 14, who missing on November 9, 2012.

Dylan’s parents were divorced and Dylan flew in to spent some time with his dad. On the day after his arrival, Mark, Dylan’s father said his son wouldn’t get up in the morning, so he went to run errands without him. When he came back, Dylan was missing.

Dylan’s remains were found in June 2013 on a mountain side 10 miles drive from Mark Redwine’s house, and according to reports only 2% of his remains were actually found.

Dr. Phil had Mark and Elaine Redwine on before, and I have seen both parents in multiple interviews. The last time Mark was on Dr. Phil he agreed to take a polygraph and then admitted to heavy drinking the night before the test, which if I remember right disqualified him for the test. And now, this time, Dr. Phil offered for him to take a lie detector again, and he refused. This does not concern me at all. Mark is not the type of guy who functions well under pressure. Furthermore, he talks about a polygraph he took prior to this one, and I can’t help but wonder if it came out inconclusive, and hence why Mark has fears. I would have fears too if I took a polygraph and it couldn’t tell if I was truthful when I was. I absolutely wouldn’t take another one. Why on earth would anyone take that risk on something that isn’t even scientific?

I do not see any hotspots in Mark’s behavior that indicate to me that he is being deceptive about his son’s disappearance in this interview. The police have been to Mark Redwine’s house and Elaine’s latest request (for her to go to his house with the sheriff) wouldn’t serve any other purpose but to try to pin the crime on Mark again. I think he was wise to refuse her request. The police have already executed a search warrant for Mark’s house. It isn’t like she would get “new” information to solve the crime. The Sheriff already did that.

I do see Dylan’s mom, Elaine, bent on a mission to convince people that Mark is the murderer rather than to actually find the truth. This concerns me. In Elaine Redwine’s initial interviews, she was inconsistent, and flagged me, though I specifically stated it doesn’t mean that she was involved. I cannot say what the inconsistencies mean. I can just say she was inconsistent. Mark hasn’t flagged me as deceptive. I had a couple of questions I wanted to ask him from previous interviews, but overall, nothing jumps out at me.

This case is a true mystery. I’d like to be able to sit down and talk to both parents to get to the heart of this story, personally.

Tom Brady’s Behavior Not Square with Honesty

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I don’t believe Tom Brady.

In the interview above, his behavior is truly supportive of someone who is less than honest, and here is why.

The interviewer asks, “Has this detracted from your joy of winning the super bowl?”

Tom replies as he soaks up the attention from his fans, “Absolutely not.”

Tom continues about the report, “I don’t really have any reaction. It’s only been 30 hours, I haven’t had much time to digest it fully but when I do, I’ll be sure to let you know how I feel about it.”

Only 30 hours?  Come on…

It’s not a new accusation, Tom. It’s been around for four months and you have no reaction?

Could it be there is nothing you can say to get you out of this so denial is your best option?

Imagine being accused of something you did NOT do–publicly–that if true tarnishes your hard earn accomplishments. Are you just going to ignore it?

You will not. I assure you.

Honest people will be offended by anyone who attacks their hard earned credibility, and at a minimum will clearly  and emphatically deny involvement. But not Tom.  No, he just sits there and soaks up the attention–ignoring everything.  And it makes sense. If he is guilty, pushing it away for as long as he can to soak up his stardom seems like the only good choice.   Deny, deny and deny until you have no other option.

When the moderator says there is an elephant in the room, listen to Tom deny it again.  It’s a joke.

Honest people don’t ignore things like this. They address it even if in the simplest of terms.

Tom eerily reminds me of Bill Cosby and his thinking:  If I ignore it, it will go away.  And sometimes it does.

The fact that Tom won’t share his phone, text messages or emails also supports Tom has something to hide.

Tom is arrogant and as I always say nothing good comes from arrogant people.

Deflate Gate: Involvement “More Probable Than Not”

Tom Brady and the head coach, Bill Belichick, of the Patriots leaks too many clues for me to believe them back in January of this year when they “played” ignorant to any knowledge or involvement.  I discussed this on my Facebook page and here on the blog.

It’s nice to see the investigation is getting to the facts now.

The truth prevails more often than not…

Self-defense or Cold Blooded Killer (48 Hours)?

Did you catch 48 Hours this weekend?

Was it a mystery for you, or did you see the truth clearly?

For me, this was a very black and white case.

Vote below and I’ll share my thoughts in the coming days!

[polldaddy poll=8829069]

My Thoughts On Psychic Medium John Edward

John Edward did his “psychic reading” on Dr. Phil this past week. I do not believe in psychic mediums or psychics at all. I think these are people who read people to some degree, and use people for pure profit.

I have yet to watch one person in nine years who I believe. Not one.

When I watch this segment with John Edward, if you watch it closely, he is playing statistical odds in an audience (that people will relate to generic statements), asking for them to fill-in-the-blanks, etc.

When he talks about a fire, he watches facial expressions. If I say fire to a victim, there is likely going to be a response on a person’s face affected by a traumatic fire. He then waits for people to give him signals. You notice he asks them to answer a lot of questions, too.

The two women talk about a woman who was dismembered and burnt. The John acts like its psychic to then later say, “Did this make the news?” Of course it would. You don’t need psychic abilities to say that!

John says he sees an older male energy and he waits for them to come up with someone. It’s playing on their emotions! And then he says he sees “smoke and fire” — DUH! That’s not psychic. And then he plays on it more by saying it “has to do with their passing”. Well, DUH, again! They told us that.

Then he talks about the fire being set to get rid of evidence. Most crimes of dismemberment and fire are usually for that purposes. Hello. That’s just a good logical deduction.  Score for John Edward:  Zero.

When he says is someone now pregnant, and that again, is likely to get a hit.  If not with these women, with someone near by. He waits for a hit!  When you look at the ages of these women, their children are close to that age or will have cousin who is–so its a sure fire hit again. He let’s the women fill in the blanks. Nothing shocking going on.

When he finds out that the crime victim was pregnant, he says there were two people. Yeah, hello, of course they will find a connection. Usually a pregnant woman has a spouse or a boyfriend, and if she was killed, they either killed her or got killed. Good guessing, right?

So then John asks again, “So I don’t know if we are talking about two people involved in this case?” You see, he knows NOTHING. He has to ask everything or make logical deductions to move forward.

I find this so disturbing!

He then brings up “S” names. Most people can come up with someone, but these two fail to do so. Then later they make a connection. They will always make a connection, if they believe. He catches people in the heat of the moment, in need of answers, who are emotional! They are the most vulnerable victims.  They will find understanding. They need it for comfort.

Keep watching.

He has to ask people a ton of questions because he truly has nothing. Then he watches their faces, reads what he can, makes logical assumptions and asks more questions. He loves these women because they are “true believers”–his best candidates. When he gets someone who shows doubt, I can assure you he moves on quickly. That’s part of the game.

John then asks if there is a similarity in the two cases. Hello! Yes! Both are murders!! We know that already. What a dumb statement.

Then he brings up DNA. Well in any crime, isn’t DNA going to be a topic of discussion? It sure is!  Nothing psychic there.

I find this utterly creepy.

When John Edwards says there is a younger female, and the women in blue offers doubt, he moves on right away! He has to find a subject who bites and statistically speaking some young woman will find a correlation, and boom, you think John is psychic. Do you see the game?

And now the believers remember someone with an “S” or an “Sk” — nothing shocking at all but boy if you didn’t take statistical odds and averages, you might believe wow! But the amount of people who know someone with an “S” or an “Sk” is quite high.

Every now and then, it will look like he knows something, but he just got a lucky hit– a true believer who thought through things, or made a good correlation for him. It is likely to happen statistically–no magical odds.

If a true psychic or medium existed, they could do readings behind a curtain and never see the people they are giving a reading to, but as you see that never happens. For a reason.

Sadly, I believe I could do this to people, and pray on their emotions and vulnerabilities and be wildly rich, but I have a conscience that won’t let me pray on victims like this. I couldn’t do it and I could lie and get rich off of the vulnerabilities of other people. I would feel like slime, and rather be dead.

Please if you are tempted to go to a psychic medium or a psychic, don’t waste your money. It’s pure rubbish.