![[78/365] - Try me](https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/3978505356_05ba0258611-199x300.jpg)
Caryn Kelley: Not Guilty?
Have you heard of the Caryn Kelley and Phillip Peatross case? Apparently one night they were arguing and fighting, and Phillip ended up dead. He supposedly left the house and then came back again. Both were drinking. This happened in Orange County, Florida.
If you listen to everything Kelley says in the 911 call, you hear incredible inconsistencies in her story. She does a “Jodi Arias” or a “Casey Anthony”. When people don’t buy her first story, she changes it over and over again–hoping like the two named before her that her latest story will stick.
And guess what?
One version finally did.
A jury bought that she acted in self-defense and let her go.
Unbelievable.
Listen to this 9-1-1 call.
Can you hear the inconsistencies?
Steve Kardian Talks about Brett Seacat and “Eyes for Lies”
Listen to Steve Kardian talk on HLN NEWS NOW about the Brett Seacat case. He mentions “Eyes for Lies”.
About Steve Kardian:
Steve Kardian is one the nation’s go-to experts on issues of women’s safety, crime prevention and risk reduction. Steve is a national media consultant for Inside Edition, CNN, Fox News, The Morning Show, CBS, NBC, Men’s Journal, the New York Times, Best Life Magazine, USA Today, the Wall Street Journal and Sports Illustrated.
Steve Kardian is called upon by the national media to offer solutions and interpretations to many of the nation’s most high profile cases. As a career law enforcement officer, detective, sergeant and chief criminal investigator, Steve has a demonstrated lifelong passion for the issue of personal safety, particularly as it applies to young women.
Rob Ford: Honest or not?
The first thing I notice with Rob Ford is his demeanor. If people are accusing you of doing something that could ruin your career that you did not do, you are not flippant, arrogant or cocky.
Ford says to the media, “As for a video, I cannot comment on a video that I have never seen or does not exist.”
This one jumps at me like a beacon in the night. If you didn’t smoke crack cocaine, you would say unequivocally, “There is no video! Period.” But Rob seems to entertain it is a possibility by what he says that a video does exist. He cannot comment on the video because he hasn’t seen it? Or that it may not exist? Really?
He continues, “I have been judged by the media without any evidence.”
This is fascinating because evidence would have no bearing if he knew he was telling the truth. He would say there is no evidence, plain and simple. There is no video. Period. But Ford cannot say that. Did you notice? It’s so telling.
Gawker may have raised the money to buy the video, but if someone, “eh-hmm”, offered the video owner more money than the $200K, what do you think will happen to that video?
Yes, it will disappear.
I do not believe Rob Ford.