Tag Archive for: Nancy Cooper

Incriminating Evidence in Brad Cooper Trial

Digital Life on Today (NBC Today Show) reported the following with regard to the Brad Cooper trial late last week:

While investigating the murder of Nancy Cooper, who never came back from a routine evening jog in 2008, police in North Carolina working with the FBI’s Cyber Task Force found damning evidence on her husband Brad’s ThinkPad laptop: Google Maps in his browsing history with locations that aligned with where his wife’s body was found.

That doesn’t bode well for Brad, if you ask me.

Read my original thoughts on Brad Cooper here back in October of 2008. Ironically, back then, I was pinged by the fact that Brad couldn’t remember his route the second time he supposedly went to the grocery store that morning…and when questioned why he took a different path, he didn’t answer.

Brad Cooper Trial to Begin This Week

Brad Cooper claims his wife went out for a morning jog on July 12, 2008 and never returned home.  Sadly, her body was later found in a drainage ditch not far from the couples home. Three months later police arrested Brad Cooper for the murder of his wife. His murder trial is expected to start this week.

The court is having a difficult time filling the jury seats in this hard economic time. They’ve gone through the entire jury pool  as they believe this case will take at least a month of time and payment will likely only be around $1,000 for the service.

Unfortunately, Brad didn’t speak out to the media outside of thanking people for searching for his wife early on in the case, and it wasn’t until his deposition was released that I got to see and hear Brad speak. I immediately noticed inconsistencies.

Brad gave us two different stories of what happened that morning. In one version, his wife notices they are out of laundry soap. In the other, he notices. In the deposition, he starts the laundry and does one load. In the affidavit, he says he “could not do laundry”. He gives us to distinctly different accounts for each. This is very telling to me. He can’t keep basic facts straight?

It’s also very notable that Brad talks about getting ready for the girls to “get up” that morning in the affidavit. Yet oddly, in his deposition, he talks about how Katie, his daughter, was up early and fussing because she didn’t have milk, and that he went to get her milk, came home and got a bottle of milk to give to Katie. Then he talks about putting her down.

Clearly, Brad has some serious explaining to do!

Read more of my deposition review here.

Thanks, Karon, for the story update.

Breaking News: Brad Cooper Indicted

Brad Cooper was indicted by a grand jury today on 1st degree murder.

That’s no surprise to me. Read what I wrote about Brad Cooper here exactly two weeks ago today.

Witness Testifies in Custody Hearing

A witness testified in the custody hearing for Brad Cooper that she saw Nancy Cooper jog the morning she went missing.

[NCWanted.com] Also testifying Thursday was Rosemary Zednick, a woman who says she was walking her dog on July 12 when she saw Nancy Cooper jogging. The two made eye contact and spoke, she said.

“I saw that gal,” Zednick said, adding that she contacted Cary police up to nine times but never heard from investigators.

“All I said to the police was ‘I don’t want Nancy Grace on my doorstep,'” she said.

Zednick said that after three months of not hearing from detectives, she went to Brad Cooper’s attorneys, who sent an investigator to interview her.

This is absolutely interesting! Is this the first and only eye-witness?

Where was Nancy when Zednick saw her? What time was it? What did they talk about? What was Nancy wearing? I’d be curious to know.

——————
Update 10:03 AM:

I found the affidavit of Rosemary Zednick here. It answers my questions above.

A Closer Look at Brad Cooper

Per your request, I have spent a short period of time watching Brad Cooper talk in the video deposition that has been released online. I also couldn’t help but glance at the affidavits in the case that were listed in the sidebar near the video links. With that, I thought I would share with you my first impressions and thoughts.

Read morePlease know I did not watch any deposition in its entirety. I reviewed at a couple of segments highlighted for me, by you, my readers. Thank you for giving me time markers, it is much appreciated.

  1. The first thing I noticed about Brad Cooper is that he is what I call a classic neutral person. Classic neutral people are void of emotional expression.

    [From an earlier post]

    These people are hardest to read, because these people don’t express a lot of emotion. Neutral people tend to lack genuine enthusiasm, and most often come across as someone who is not excitable. They usually come across as mundane and monotone.

    While the majority of people who fall into the neutral category are suspicious, it does not mean that they are lying. And that is where it gets tricky. Some people just lack normal expressive emotions and instead are subdued, even when they are telling the truth.

    With that, I am left to ask, is this normal behavior for Brad, or is this notable and unusual?

    Most people are not this baseline in their emotions especially after something as traumatic as loss of your wife to murder. Most people would be devastated/angry/mad for their children that they have been robbed of a mother, at the very least. Yet I see none of this with Brad. It definitely raises my eyebrows.

    Since Brad does seem to be a reserved type of person who could repress his emotions, and he was going through a divorce, I would need to know from his friends if this is the “typical Brad” or if his behavior is notably different. If his friends told me his emotions were notably void here, it would raise a big red flag.

  2. Since we can’t depend on Brad’s emotions and body language to guide us positively or negatively, the next thing we need to look at are his words, and the facts. Is Brad consistent in what he is saying?

    The first video I zoomed into was what Brad says happened the day that Nancy disappeared. Almost immediately, I found a big inconsistency in what Brad is saying when he talks about running to the store the morning Nancy disappeared. In the deposition here (around time marker 25:00), Brad talks about how his wife Nancy was upset that they were out of detergent.

    Questioner:
    When you got home from the Harris Teeter, what did you do?

    Cooper:
    When I got home from Harris Teeter, I put the milk back in the fridge. Um..by this time, the washing machine had finished the first load that, um, we had put in earlier, and um, Nancy then indicated that we were out of laundry detergent and was upset that we were out of laundry detergent as well.

    Questioner:
    Was she upset with you about that?

    Cooper:
    Yes, she… well, she was upset that one, we ran low on milk, we ran low on laundry detergent, and um, she was gone the week prior so she kind of felt it was my fault that I hadn’t restocked with milk and laundry detergent. (Time marker 25:18).

    Questioner:
    So what does she say?

    Cooper:
    She indicated that it was kind of my fault and therefore my responsibility and hop back in the car and go to the store and pick up laundry detergent.

  3. If you compare that to what Brad said in an affidavit here, Brad’s story has changed.

    “I start to get ready for the girls to get up and noticed we were out of laundry detergent and could not do laundry, so Nancy asked me to go back out to get some laundry detergent around 6:30 A.M.”

    I find this odd and perplexing. Why is Brad not able to keep his facts straight? In one version, his wife notices they are out of laundry soap. In the other, he notices. In the deposition, he starts the laundry and does one load. In the affidavit, he says he “could not do laundry”.

    This is a notable red flag. When we are honest, we remember the basic details of what we did and who discovered what. We don’t confuse basic facts such as this.

  4. It’s also very notable (above) that Brad talks about getting ready for the girls to “get up” in the affidavit. Yet oddly, in his deposition, he talks about how Katie, his daughter, was up early and fussing because she didn’t have milk, and that he went to get her milk, came home and got a bottle of milk to give to Katie. He wasn’t home a few minutes before the laundry detergent scenario played out, and after returning with the laundry detergent he tells us he takes Katie back upstairs with him to put her down.

    What is the truth here? Was Katie up or not? Clearly, Brad is having a hard time keeping his facts straight and that begs us to question why.

  5. It’s odd, too, that when Brad Cooper went to the grocery store the first time, he knew exactly how he got there. He was sure about his route. The second time, however, he couldn’t remember which way he went, yet he said he remembered getting a phone call at a specific intersection. Why did he take a different route? How come he remembers this specific phone call, but he doesn’t remember the different route? It’s perplexing. Notice that Brad is asked why he took a different route, but he doesn’t answer the question.
  6. Brad Cooper in this deposition tells us that he cleaned out the garage on June 28th so that one car could fit into their two car garage. He explains that it was summer and hot, and that Nancy needed a cool car for the kids.

    Yet ironically, Gary Beard, of Gary’s Pest Control, says in his affidavit that he entered the garage on July 8 and that there was no way a car could be parked inside the garage due to the toys and things Brad says he supposedly removed. It’s another inconsistency, another oddity, another red flag. Why would Gary Beard lie about this? Why would Brad Cooper lie about this?

At this point, from what little I have reviewed, I think it is clear that Brad is unable to keep his facts straight, and that concerns me.
_______________________________
Update:  Brad Cooper was sentenced to life in prison May 2011 for the killing of his wife, Nancy.