MSNBC has an interesting article about what can put you at risk for identity theft. I think the risk factors may surprise you!
Have you recently had a child, gotten divorced or bought a house? You are at an increased risk for ID theft.
If you experience any of these life events, you might want to monitor your credit more closely.
Rachel Dolezal gives me great pause, and I cringe when people say we should look at the good she did and ignore the bad.
Rachel is a manipulative person who seeks attention and limelight, and will lie to get it.
She will tell serious lies to get it.
I do not believe Rachel did what she did for the good of society or for the NAACP, but rather it was only to further her own agenda.
She isn’t even taking responsibility for the lies she told, and goes so far as to essentially expresses that she has been treated inhumanely.
Rachel has filed many complaints with the police claiming not only hate crimes, but she also sued the university that she attended in 2002 claiming discrimination based on race, pregnancy, family responsibilities and gender. And I don’t believe at that time she was claiming to be black.
She is simply out for attention and nothing more. Don’t let her fool you.
MSN is reporting that on May 27, the Department of Human Services (DHS) was called to check on one of the minor Duggar children, and when they went to the Duggar home, the Duggars refused access and wouldn’t cooperate. DHS was then required to call the police for assistance.
InTouch magazine, according to MSN, says this is a repeat of what happened in 2006.
On June 4, 2015, I wrote that I did not believe the Duggars were telling us the truth and a lot has become public since this time strongly indicating the Duggars want you to believe things that are simply untrue.
You don’t hide when you tell the truth.
In the video above, the parents of 13-year old Amber Peat plead for her return. They came back from a family holiday on Friday, and Saturday afternoon Amber had a disagreement over chores and left the house. She was sadly found hanged three days later approximately a mile from the family home, according to news reports.
A reader has asked me to look at the parents to see if I see anything of concern.
When I watch the parents, I see anguish and pain, which can support both sides of the equation here. It could support involvement or non-involvement. Outside of that, I only see one area I would like to probe to understand the situation better. I wouldn’t necessarily call it a red flag, but something I’d like to get clarification on.
If anyone sees any other interviews with the parents, please let me know.
My heart goes out to Amber’s family.
Yesterday, Dr. Phil spent the last 15 minutes of his show talking with Elaine Redwine, mother of Dylan, 14, who missing on November 9, 2012.
Dylan’s parents were divorced and Dylan flew in to spent some time with his dad. On the day after his arrival, Mark, Dylan’s father said his son wouldn’t get up in the morning, so he went to run errands without him. When he came back, Dylan was missing.
Dylan’s remains were found in June 2013 on a mountain side 10 miles drive from Mark Redwine’s house, and according to reports only 2% of his remains were actually found.
Dr. Phil had Mark and Elaine Redwine on before, and I have seen both parents in multiple interviews. The last time Mark was on Dr. Phil he agreed to take a polygraph and then admitted to heavy drinking the night before the test, which if I remember right disqualified him for the test. And now, this time, Dr. Phil offered for him to take a lie detector again, and he refused. This does not concern me at all. Mark is not the type of guy who functions well under pressure. Furthermore, he talks about a polygraph he took prior to this one, and I can’t help but wonder if it came out inconclusive, and hence why Mark has fears. I would have fears too if I took a polygraph and it couldn’t tell if I was truthful when I was. I absolutely wouldn’t take another one. Why on earth would anyone take that risk on something that isn’t even scientific?
I do not see any hotspots in Mark’s behavior that indicate to me that he is being deceptive about his son’s disappearance in this interview. The police have been to Mark Redwine’s house and Elaine’s latest request (for her to go to his house with the sheriff) wouldn’t serve any other purpose but to try to pin the crime on Mark again. I think he was wise to refuse her request. The police have already executed a search warrant for Mark’s house. It isn’t like she would get “new” information to solve the crime. The Sheriff already did that.
I do see Dylan’s mom, Elaine, bent on a mission to convince people that Mark is the murderer rather than to actually find the truth. This concerns me. In Elaine Redwine’s initial interviews, she was inconsistent, and flagged me, though I specifically stated it doesn’t mean that she was involved. I cannot say what the inconsistencies mean. I can just say she was inconsistent. Mark hasn’t flagged me as deceptive. I had a couple of questions I wanted to ask him from previous interviews, but overall, nothing jumps out at me.
This case is a true mystery. I’d like to be able to sit down and talk to both parents to get to the heart of this story, personally.